Grand Rounds November 6, 2026: Boosting Peri-Operative Pain Care: Mixed Results (and Myriad Implications) From the NOHARM Pragmatic Trial (Andrea Cheville, MD; Jon Tilburt, MD)

Speakers

Andrea Cheville, MD
Physiatrist
Mayo Clinic

Jon Tilburt, MD
Internist
Mayo Clinic

Keywords

Nonpharmacologic Pain Care; Pain; Peri-operative; Surgery; Opioid Use

Key Points

  • Nonpharmacologic pain care (NPPC) is effective across numerous conditions; has low toxicity and few adverse effects; addresses pain and co-occurring symptoms; and is often inexpensive and accessible. However, it can be difficult to implement given barriers like limited clinician time, skepticism, heterogeneous patient preferences, and the need for reinforcement over time.
  • NOHARM is an NIH Collaboratory trial examining how health systems can deliver guideline-concordant NPPC at a population scale. 60,000 surgical patients were enrolled across 6 campuses. The study team’s goals were to support patient education and decision-making around options for NPPC and to support patients in their pursuit of NPPC modalities, not to deny patients access to necessary or helpful opioids or other pharmacologic options.
  • Roughly 1/3 of participants received usual care while roughly 2/3 received a bundled pain education and decision support intervention promoting NPPC use, including a portal-based conversation guide; electronic health record clinical decision support; enhanced patient education; and non-pharmacological pain self-management materials. The primary outcomes were pain interference and physical function.
  • The researchers found no statistically significant impact on the co-primary outcomes. There was, however, a 10% reduction in overall 3-month post-operative opioid consumption, with no increase in adverse events or fall risks.
  • NOHARM is a scalable primary prevention strategy that can reduce exposure, make stewardship part of routine care, and reach surgical populations alongside more intensive perioperative pathways and programs.

Discussion Themes

Challenges included low-touch patient engagement, pandemic-driven nursing staff turnover, and the ongoing technical and organizational effort required to sustain EHR functionality post-trial.

A secondary sensitivity analysis supported non-inferiority for the primary pain and function outcomes. Attendees noted a positive clinical interpretation: patients in the intervention group achieved equivalent pain control while requiring significantly lower opioid doses.

Targeting bedside nurses and occupational or physical therapists—rather than prescribing physicians—was key to supporting patients during acute pain episodes.

test gr

Speaker

[Speaker, Postnomials]
[Associations]

Keywords

[keywords]

Key Points

  • [Point 1]
  • [Point 2]
  • [Point 3]

Discussion Themes

[Theme 1] [Theme 2, 3, 4]

Grand Rounds July 17, 2026: Sodium Bicarbonate for Metabolic Acidosis in the Intensive Care Unit (Ary Serpa Neto, MD, MSc, PhD, FCICM)

Speaker

Ary Serpa Neto, MD, MSc, PhD, FCICM
Associate Professor
Co-Deputy Director, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University
Intensivist and Director of Intensive Care Research, Austin Health

Keywords

Intensive Care Unit; MAKE30; Kidneys; Metabolic Acidosis; Sodium Bicarbonate

Key Points

  • Metabolic acidosis affects roughly 10% of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with poor outcomes. The longer it persists, the more dangerous it becomes. There is evidence to suggest that treatment with a hypertonic sodium bicarbonate solution can improve outcomes.
  • The Sodium Bicarbonate for Metabolic Acidosis in the ICU (SODa-BIC) trial aimed to test whether the use of sodium bicarbonate reduced major adverse kidney events in adults with metabolic acidosis receiving vasopressor support. They conducted the trial across 7 countries to increase patient volume and external validity. The primary outcome was major adverse kidney events within 30 days.
  • The SODa-BIC research team concluded that sodium bicarbonate therapy did not reduce major adverse kidney events in their target population.

Discussion Themes

Double-blinding was chosen to eliminate bias in subjective decisions, such as the initiation of renal replacement therapy. Completing a pilot study with 30 patients was essential for securing major funding, as it proved the trial’s feasibility and the efficacy of the blinding strategy.

The research team had to develop an in-house solution using 5% dextrose because sodium bicarbonate is incompatible with other common fluids.

In Australia and New Zealand, researchers utilize a formal process where they present trial ideas to the clinical community for critique and endorsement before applying for funding. This improves trial design and site engagement.

Next steps include an individual patient data meta-analysis combining SODa-BIC data with that of similar trials and a potential new trial specifically targeting patients with advanced kidney injury.

Podcast July 15, 2026: Slow Recruitment Mitigation Strategies (Christine Goertz, PhD; Steven George, PhD)

In this episode of the NIH Collaboratory Podcast, Steven George and Christine Goertz discuss slow recruitment mitigation strategies, one of the small group discussion topics at the NIH Pragmatic Trial Collaboratory’s Steering Committee meeting in April 2026.

Transcript coming soon. For alerts about new episodes, subscribe for free on Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, or SoundCloud.

June 11, 2026: Harnessing Qualitative Methods in Pragmatic Trials: An Interview With Emily O’Brien and David Chambers

Qualitative methods can bring additional dimensions to pragmatic research to help study teams better understand participants’ experiences, improve recruitment and retention, and contextualize study results. At the NIH Collaboratory’s 2026 Annual Steering Committee Meeting, we spoke with Emily O’Brien and David Chambers about the ways researchers can use qualitative methods to enhance pragmatic trials.

“It’s been really fun to see all the different ways the investigators [for the NIH Collaboratory Trials] have incorporated qualitative methods to complement the other kinds of methods they use in their studies,” said O’Brien, an associate professor of population health sciences at Duke University and cochair of the NIH Collaboratory’s Patient Centered Outcomes Core.

O’Brien highlighted the experience of the MOMs Chat & Care Study, in which the research team used narrative interviews, a method of qualitative data collection that asks participants to produce in-depth stories to describe their experiences.

“This is going to be really helpful in contextualizing the results and trying to understand better which populations the intervention works well for and, if they can improve the intervention in the future, what that might look like,” O’Brien said.

Go to the full video.

“One of the main challenges in integrating qualitative data into pragmatic clinical trials is that there are so many ways you can use qualitative data,” said Chambers. Chambers is deputy director for implementation science at the National Cancer Institute.

“You can use it to refine an intervention, to understand the results better, to improve your recruitment strategies,” he said, “so it’s really about prioritization and trying to figure out how to identify the highest-value opportunities to collect those data and make sure the study is informed by whatever you’re finding from the qualitative data.”

Go to the full interview.

In the coming weeks, we will share more highlights from the 2026 Annual Steering Committee Meeting. Access the complete meeting materials.

Video still from an interview with Dr. Emily O'Brien and Dr. David Chambers
Dr. Emily O’Brien and Dr. David Chambers

 

April 2026 Annual Steering Committee Meeting

April 13-14, 2026 | Bethesda, MD

Main Purpose

Day 1: Address challenges and share lessons from new, in-progress, and completed NIH Collaboratory Trials to promote meaningful evidence generation; learn about new methodologies and areas of focus for embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs); and have rich discussions on topics including qualitative research and in-depth feasibility assessment.

Day 2: Address challenges and share lessons from new, in-progress, and completed NIH Collaboratory Trials; discuss strategies for boosting the efficiency, relevancy, and impact of ePCTs, including approaches for interpretation and dissemination of findings and innovative, responsible use of artificial intelligence tools.

Photo of a large conference room

Agenda and Slides

Day 1: Monday, April 13, 2026

Welcome and Opening Remarks

David Shurtleff, PhD; Richard Hodes, MD; Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH; Beda Jean-Francois, PhD; Lesley Curtis, PhD

Charting the Course for Pragmatic Research: Pain Care and Beyond

Explore what’s on the horizon for the ePCT ecosystem (NIH Collaboratory and beyond); Discuss priority evidence needs that may be addressed through ePCTs; Identify the methods and knowledge required for the next generation of ePCTs, including existing gaps

Moderator: Rob Califf, MD

Presenters: Kevin Weinfurt, PhD; David Shurtleff, PhD

Panel:

Campfire Session: EquiP PC

Describe challenges and ongoing issues; Hear advice from other investigators

Kari Stephens, PhD

Discovery in Disguise: Lessons From “Neutral” ePCTs

Discuss techniques for designing ePCTs that provide reliable, actionable evidence; Share statistical approaches and considerations based on ePCTs with nonsignificant effects on their primary outcomes; Examine what is gained from ePCTs that do not meet their primary outcome

Moderator: Josie Briggs, MD

Panel:

Harnessing Qualitative Research in ePCTs

Describe opportunities for qualitative methods to enhance ePCTs (eg, refining workflows, preparing for implementation); Share successful qualitative research methods employed by NIH Collaboratory Trials; Discuss ways to navigate challenges of qualitative research in ePCTs, such as timing, resources, and how to share qualitative data

Moderator: Emily O'Brien, PhD

Presenter: David Chambers, DPhil

Panel:

  • Michele Balas, PhD, RN, CCRN-K, FCCM, FAAN
  • Melissa Basile, PhD
  • Jennifer Kawi, PhD, MSN, FNP-BC, CNE, FAAN
  • Richard Skolasky, ScD

Lightning Talks: Sharing Lessons and Top-Level Results

Describe top-level results, lessons learned, and future plans; 3 minutes per trial followed by 15 minutes of open discussion with attendees

Andrea Cheville, MD, MSCE; Ardith Doorenbos, PhD, RN, FAAN; Natalia Morone, MD, MS; Kathleen Sluka, PT, PhD

More Than Kicking the Tires: Assessing Feasibility in the Planning Phase

Discuss how assessing feasibility is not only about meeting milestones; Share examples of how ePCT researchers can discover and tackle difficult challenges in the planning phase; Explore benefits and challenges of an in-depth feasibility assessment in ePCTs

Moderator: Angelo Volandes, MD, MPH

Panel:

  • Karen Kehl, PhD, RN, FPCN
  • Amanda Petrik, PhD
  • Sebastian Tong, MD, MPH
  • Chenchen Wang, MD, MSc

Closing Remarks

David Shurtleff, PhD; Richard Hodes, MD; Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH; Beda Jean-Francois, PhD; Lesley Curtis, PhD

Day 2: Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Opening Remarks

David Shurtleff, PhD; Richard Hodes, MD; Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH; Beda Jean-Francois, PhD; Lesley Curtis, PhD

Campfire Session: CARNATION

Describe challenges and ongoing issues; Hear advice from other investigators

Lynn DeBar, PhD, MPH; Rachel Gold, PhD, MPH; Nicole Cook, PhD, MPA

Networking

Consult with Core chairs and colleagues on issues your trial is facing; Engage in small group discussion

Slow Recruitment: Strategies for Prevention and Mitigation

  • Steven George, PT, PhD, FAPTA
  • Christine Goertz, DC, PhD

Data Sharing and Repositories for HEAL/PRISM Trials: Best Practices, HEAL CDE Framework, etc.

  • Andrea Cheville, MD, MSCE
  • Keith Marsolo, PhD

Use of Digital Tools: Practical, Regulatory, and Ethical Issues

  • Joseph Ali, JD

Dissemination Done Better: Practical Tips for ePCT Researchers

Describe how to collaborate with partners in interpreting findings prior to dissemination; Share successful dissemination strategies from NIH Collaboratory Trials that have helped promote changes in care; Explore approaches for dissemination of findings beyond the publication of results in an academic journal

Moderator: Hayden Bosworth, PhD

Panel:

ePCTs in the AI Revolution: Balancing Innovation With Responsibility

Share new and emerging AI capabilities with the potential to transform ePCTs; Discuss ethical considerations associated with AI use in research, such as when a human should be in the loop; Describe challenges and areas of uncertainty for ePCTs in the era of AI

Moderator: Adrian Hernandez, MD, MHS

Presenter: Emily O'Brien, PhD

Panel:

  • Guilherme Del Fiol, MD, PhD
  • Michael Ho, MD, PhD
  • Keith Marsolo, PhD
  • Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA
  • Angelo Volandes, MD, MPH

Closing Remarks

David Shurtleff, PhD; Richard Hodes, MD; Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH; Beda Jean-Francois, PhD; Lesley Curtis, PhD

NIH Collaboratory-Hosted Workshop: Endpoint Strategy in Pragmatic Trials (September 2026)

This 2-day workshop held in September 2026 addressed considerations for selecting endpoints that reliably measure concepts of interest in ePCTs; influential factors in the analysis and interpretation of treatment effects; applications of multicomponent and hierarchical endpoints; and real-world examples of various endpoint strategies in ePCTs.

 

Grand Rounds January 9, 2026: Pragmatic Care Embedded Randomization: Insights From the KP-VACCINATE Megatrial (Ankeet S. Bhatt, MD, MBA, ScM)

Speaker

Ankeet S. Bhatt, MD, MBA, ScM
Cardiologist, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center
Research Scientist, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research
Assistant Professor, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine
Adjunct Professor, Stanford University School of Medicine

Keywords

Vaccination; Learning Health System; Implementation Science; Nudges; Influenza; Cardiovascular

Key Points

  • Every year, influenza leads to over 500,000 deaths and 3-5 million severe cases globally. It increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events like myocardial infarction and heart failure. Though health guidelines strongly recommend annual influenza vaccination, rates remain suboptimal globally and persistent inequities exist. There’s an urgent need for novel, effective, and scalable strategies to improve influenza vaccination rates.
  • The KP-VACCINATE trial is one of the largest ever conducted, randomizing over 3.6 million patients in under 30 days. It included several pragmatic elements, such as coordination with existing vaccine promotion efforts; randomization performed by operational health system teams; and endpoint capture fully embedded in the electronic health record.
  • The study team assessed the effect of a cardiovascular-focused nudge communication on influenza vaccination rates and found that there was no effect. Despite the negative results, the trial establishes that pragmatic and rapid randomization of communication strategies is operationally feasible at scale with routine healthcare workflows in the US.

Discussion Themes

The study team targeted a larger-than-usual population in order to 1) demonstrate the feasibility of randomization within a large-scale health system, and 2) be well-powered for subgroup analyses that could help tailor future interventions.

Dr. Bhatt viewed the negative result as an illustration of the importance of design and context for interventions based in behavioral science, rather than an indication that nudges are ineffective.

Future directions may include involvement of the broader care team, with primary care providers and specialty providers playing a potentially critical role in nudging patients towards vaccine uptake.

Digging Into Dilemmas of Pragmatic Clinical Trials: NIH Collaboratory Virtual Workshop (November 2025)

November 4-5, 2025: This 2-day workshop focused on the perspectives of providers, healthcare systems, regulators, and payers that can inform better approaches to research embedded in healthcare delivery. A series of panels discussed considerations for research in healthcare systems across a variety of communities; platform trials as an emerging method; implications of pragmatic trials with null findings for future pragmatic research; and the role of pragmatic trials in comparative effectiveness research of artificial intelligence algorithms.

Agenda, Slides, and Recordings

Day 1: November 4

Welcome and Introduction

Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH*
Helene Langevin, MD*
Presented by: Lesley Curtis, PhD

Keynote: Landscape of Healthcare in America: Gaps and Opportunities (That Researchers Need to Hear)

David Zaas, MD, MBA

Session 1: Understanding Needs and Priorities of Health Systems Across Communities

Moderator: Cherise Harrington, PhD, MPH

Panel:

  • Aimee Eden, PhD, MPH*
  • Rachel Gold, PhD, MPH
  • Caleb Holtzer, MD, MPH
  • Ann Sheehy, MD, MS*
  • Sebastian Tong, MD, MPH

Session 2: Realizing the Potential of Platform Trials

Moderator: Adrian Hernandez, MD, MHS

Panel:

  • Marianne Kearney Chase
  • Martin Landray, MB ChB, PhD
  • Gregory Levin, PhD
  • Christopher Lindsell, PhD
  • Bijoy Menon, MBBS, MD, DM, MSc

Summary and Concluding Remarks

Lesley Curtis, PhD
Cherise Harrington, PhD, MPH
Adrian Hernandez, MD, MHS
Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH*

Day 2: November 5

Welcome and Introduction

Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH*
Helene Langevin, MD*
Presented by: Kevin Weinfurt, PhD

Session 3: What Do We Learn From Null Pragmatic Trials?

Presenter: Kevin Weinfurt, PhD

Moderator: Josephine Briggs, MD

Panel:

  • Corita Grudzen, MD, MSHS
  • Michael Ho, MD, PhD
  • Vincent Mor, PhD
  • Miguel Vazquez, MD

Session 4: What Is the Role of ePCTs in the Age of Artificial Intelligence?

Moderator: Emily O'Brien, PhD

Panel:

  • Adrian Hernandez, MD, MHS
  • Michael Ho, MD, PhD
  • Rohan Khera, MD, MS
  • Edward Melnick, MD, MHS
  • Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA
  • Kenneth Wiley, PhD*


Summary and Concluding Remarks

Josephine Briggs, MD
Lesley Curtis, PhD
Emily O'Brien, PhD
Wendy Weber, ND, PhD, MPH*
Kevin Weinfurt, PhD

*Participated in workshop planning but unable to attend the live event due to the federal government shutdown.

September 8, 2025: P Values vs Decision-Maker Perspectives, in a Special Grand Rounds Session on September 26

In a special session of Rethinking Clinical Trials Grand Rounds on September 26, longtime leaders from the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory will present “Significance in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: P Values vs Decision-Maker Perspectives.”

The Grand Rounds session will be held on Friday, September 26, 2025, at 1:00 pm eastern.

Greg Simon is a senior investigator at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, a member of the NIH Collaboratory leadership team, and a cochair of the NIH Collaboratory’s Health Care Systems Interactions Core. Susan Huang is a Chancellor’s Professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the UC Irvine School of Medicine and the medical director of epidemiology and infection prevention at UCI Health. She was the principal investigator for ABATE Infection, an NIH Collaboratory Trial. Liz Turner is an associate professor of biostatistics and bioinformatics and global health at Duke University and a cochair of the NIH Collaboratory’s Biostatistics and Study Design Core.

Join the online meeting.