Skip to content

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
  • Home
  • About
    • NIH Collaboratory
      • Coordinating Center
      • NIH Collaboratory Trials
      • Core Working Groups
      • Steering Committee
      • Distributed Research Network
      • Our Impact
    • Living Textbook
      • Table of Contents
      • How to Use This Site
  • Resources
    • Data and Resource Sharing
    • Training Resources
    • Tools for Researchers
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Repository
  • Webinar
  • Podcast
  • News
    • News Feed
    • Calendar
    • Subscribe
return to home
Subscribe to Newsletter go to twitter feed go to linkedin go to blue sky feed
Search
NIH Collaboratory
Living Textbook of
Pragmatic Clinical Trials

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
home button

Rethinking Clinical Trials

A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials

  • Design
    • What is a Pragmatic Clinical Trial?
    • Decentralized Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Developing a Compelling Grant Application
    • Experimental Designs and Randomization Schemes
    • Endpoints and Outcomes
    • Analysis Plan
    • Using Electronic Health Record Data
    • Building Partnerships and Teams to Ensure a Successful Trial
    • Intervention Delivery and Complexity
    • Patient Engagement
  • Data, Tools & Conduct
    • Assessing Feasibility
    • Acquiring Real-World Data
    • Assessing Fitness-for-Use of Real-World Data
    • Study Startup
    • Participant Recruitment
    • Monitoring Intervention Fidelity and Adaptations
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Mobile Health
    • Electronic Health Records–Based Phenotyping
    • Navigating the Unknown
  • Dissemination & Implementation
    • Data Sharing and Embedded Research
    • Dissemination Approaches for Different Audiences
    • Implementation
    • End-of-Trial Decision-Making
  • Ethics & Regulatory
    • Privacy Considerations
    • Identifying Those Engaged in Research
    • Collateral Findings
    • Consent, Disclosure, and Non-Disclosure
    • Data and Safety Monitoring
    • Ethical Considerations of Data Sharing in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Ethics for AI and ML
    • IRB Responsibilities and Procedures

Introduction

CHAPTER SECTIONS

Patient Engagement


Section 1

Introduction

Expand Contributors

Steven Z. George, PT, PhD

Contributing Editor

Hannah Webster, MPH

Gina Uhlenbrauck

Karen Staman, MS

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are research studies that are conducted in the context of routine clinical care and therefore have the potential to represent and prioritize the perspectives of an array of key individuals, including patients.

Terms We Will Use

Several terms used throughout this chapter may have different meanings in different contexts, such as explanatory trials. For the purpose of this chapter, the following terms are defined as such:

  • Patient partners: A patient engaged with a research team to play a role in trial design, trial conduct, and/or dissemination of information from the trial. Patient refers to individuals seeking healthcare or community resources related to their health or well-being.
  • Partner (sometimes referred to as “stakeholder”): “An individual or group who is responsible for or affected by health- and healthcare-related decisions that can be informed by research evidence” (Concannon et al 2012). Note: The term stakeholder has been widely used in the context of public health and clinical research. However, many are encouraging the use of partner to reduce jargon and promote inclusion.
  • Engagement: A bidirectional relationship between the partner and researcher that results in informed decision-making about the selection, conduct, and use of research (Concannon et al 2012). The word ‘engagement’ is not being used in the regulatory context, but is being used to describe involvement/interaction with partners.
  • Patient engagement: Although this is often referred to as “participant” engagement, we use the term patient for clarity because, in the PCT setting, some trials include clinicians as the recipients of interventions.
  • Lived experience: The valuable, unique perspective that partners bring to clinical research from firsthand involvement in situations or events in their everyday lives.
  • Patient-centered care: “Patient-centered care focuses on the patient and the individual's particular health care needs. The goal of patient-centered health care is to empower patients to become active participants in their care” (Reynolds 2009).
  • Other partners: Additional individuals with valuable perspectives for PCTs who are not patient partners (PCORI 2014). Perspectives of other partners, such as clinicians and health system leaders, are also indispensable for PCTs. We describe the full breadth of partners for PCTs in the chapter "Building Partnerships and Teams to Ensure a Successful Trial."

What Is Patient Engagement?

Because patients can provide valuable insights and perspectives about clinical care for specific conditions, they are key partners for PCTs.

Once regarded as “subjects” who had research performed on them, patients are now contributing across the spectrum of clinical development, including in the design and planning of research protocols, selection of outcomes and endpoints, development of recruitment and retention strategies, and dissemination of research results. (Uhlenbrauck et al 2018)

Comprehensive patient engagement plays an instrumental role in PCTs because these trials are designed to inform an aspirational model for how routine clinical practice should operate. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) recommends patients be considered valuable partners whose expertise will influence research to be more patient-centered, relevant, and potentially sustainable (PCORI 2018). The term patient engagement refers to an array of activities with various levels of involvement from patient partners (Table).

Table. Level of Patient Engagement in Research

Role Description Example
Representative The patient partner is present but not an active or equal participant. A patient partner is invited to attend a meeting but primarily in a passive role and without equal authority.
Consultant The patient partner provides input on a select aspect of research but is still external to the research team. A patient partner participates in a focus group or completes a survey about one aspect of the research.
Partnership The patient partner is part of an equal partnership with the research team. A patient is fully incorporated into the research team and contributes to the development of the research questions, trial design, trial conduct, and dissemination of results. The patient partner is acknowledged as a coinvestigator.
Leadership The patient partner is actively controlling, directing, and managing the research. A patient is the lead investigator, responsible for developing the research either solely or as a co–principal investigator with traditional researchers.
Advocate The patient partner focuses on patients’ rights and lobbying for changes, often with a specific agenda related to research priorities or resources. A patient or patient organization lobbies the government for increased funding for research on a specific disease.

Adapted from Duffet (2017).

While it may be ideal to engage patients at every stage of a trial, patient engagement occurs on a spectrum, and researchers should prioritize time and resources for engagement activities that provide the most value.

Perspectives of other partners, such as clinicians and health system leaders, are also indispensable for PCTs. We describe the full breadth of partners for PCTs in the chapter "Building Partnerships and Teams to Ensure a Successful Trial." Resources for clinician and health system engagement can also be found on the Health Care Systems Interactions Core page. Resources, such as this ePCT Quick Start Guide for Researchers and Health System Leader Partnerships, are designed to promote successful partnerships.

Patient engagement can be ongoing or targeted.

  • Ongoing engagement refers to engaging with patient partners at multiple points throughout a trial’s life cycle until results are communicated back to patients and, ideally, knowledge learned is sustained in clinical practice.
  • Targeted engagement generally refers to engagement at one point in time that elicits information.

This chapter explores key principles of patient engagement, engagement strategies, potential barriers, and case studies in the PCT context.

Next Section

SECTIONS

CHAPTER SECTIONS

sections

  1. Introduction
  2. Key Principles of Patient Engagement
  3. Patient Engagement Throughout a PCT
  4. Value of Patient Engagement to PCTs
  5. Ethical Considerations for Patient Engagement
  6. Potential Challenges
  7. Case Study: Patient Engagement in the OPTIMUM Trial
  8. Equity and Inclusion
  9. Additional Resources

Resources

CTTI Patient Group Engagement Resources

Recommendations and tools for engaging patient groups in clinical research

CTTI Prioritization Tool for Sponsors and Patient Groups

Interactive tool that helps patient groups and clinical research sponsors identify high-value opportunities to work together

FDA Patient-Focused Drug Development

Includes guidance and resources to facilitate the incorporation of patient input in research

REFERENCES

back to top

Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, et al. 2012. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 27(8):985-991. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1. PMID: 22528615.

Duffett L. 2017. Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about. Thrombosis Research. 150:113-120. PMID: 27817863.

PCORI. 2018. The Value of Engagement. PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute) website. https://www.pcori.org/engagement/value-engagement. Accessed January 21, 2024.

Reynolds A. 2009. Patient-centered Care. Radiol Technol. 81(2):133-47. PMID: 19901351.

Uhlenbrauck G, Singler L, McAdams P, et al. 2018. Models of engagement: patients as partners in clinical research. Appl Clin Trials. 27(6):28-31. https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/models-engagement-patients-partners-clinical-research-0. Accessed December 7, 2023.

back to top


Version History

Published February 12, 2024

current section :

Introduction

  1. Introduction
  2. Key Principles of Patient Engagement
  3. Patient Engagement Throughout a PCT
  4. Value of Patient Engagement to PCTs
  5. Ethical Considerations for Patient Engagement
  6. Potential Challenges
  7. Case Study: Patient Engagement in the OPTIMUM Trial
  8. Equity and Inclusion
  9. Additional Resources

Citation:

George SZ. Patient Engagement: Introduction. In: Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Bethesda, MD: NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Available at: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/chapters/design/patient-engagement/patient-engagement-introduction/. Updated October 7, 2025. DOI: 10.28929/240.

Footer Menu

  • How to Use This Site
  • About NIH Collaboratory
  • Enrollment Reporting
  • Grand Rounds
  • Funding Statement
Link to Twitter Link to LinkedIn Link to Blue Sky Link to NIH Collaboratory email

Reference in this Web site to any specific commercial products, process, service, manufacturer, or company does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Government or National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH is not responsible for the contents of any “off-site” Web page referenced from this server.

Log in
Privacy Statement
WordPress is a content management system and should not be used to upload any PHI as it is not an environment for which we exercise oversight, meaning you the author are responsible for the content you post. Please use this system accordingly. Site Map