December 8, 2025: New Podcast Explores Partnership Between Rural-Focused Research Network and BeatPain, an NIH Collaboratory Trial

In a new episode of the Rethinking Clinical Trials Podcast, Julie Fritz of the University of Utah and Sebastian Tong of the University of Washington expanded on key takeaways from their recent Grand Rounds presentation, “Integrating the BeatPain Study With PRaCTICe, a New Network Research Hub of the CARE for Health Initiative.”

Listen to the podcast. For alerts about new episodes, subscribe for free on Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, or SoundCloud.

In an effort to connect patients in rural areas with innovative care, the Primary Care Rural and Frontier Clinical Trials Innovation Center (PRaCTICe) partnered with BeatPain. In the podcast, Fritz and Tong discuss what made the partnership a good fit.

“The BeatPain study was meeting a need that clinicians that patients had identified: access to non-pharmacological treatments for chronic pain that are evidence-based in many places there just wasn’t access to physical therapy,” said Tong.

Roughly a year into their collaboration, PRaCTICe had referred 165 patients to the BeatPain team, 95% of which were rural residents. Fritz and Tong each shared some of their lessons learned around building trust and capacity in low resource settings.

“Local people who support what you’re doing, that you build relationships with so they know that you’re doing the best you can by the participants that come out of their clinics, I think that’s been key to building successful partnerships. Both at the clinical level and at the patient level,” said Fritz.

BeatPain Utah, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, is comparing the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic intervention strategies for patients with back pain seeking care in federally qualified health centers throughout the state of Utah.

Fritz is the principal investigator for BeatPain Utah and a distinguished professor of physical therapy and athletic training at the University of Utah. Tong is a co–principal investigator for AIM-CP, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, and an associate professor of family medicine at the University of Washington.

Grand Rounds October 10, 2025: Integrating the BeatPain Study With PRaCTICe, a New Network Research Hub of the CARE for Health Initiative (Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, FAPTA; Sebastian Tong, MD, MPH)

Speakers

Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, FAPTA
Distinguished Professor
Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training University of Utah

Sebastian Tong, MD, MPH
Associate Professor
University of Washington

Keywords

Engagement; Community-Engaged Research; Rural; Pain; Partnership

Key Points

  • In an assessment of 10 high-income nations, the United States ranked 10th in healthcare system performance despite maintaining a significant lead in terms of healthcare spending.
  • The capacity of clinical research to improve healthcare is limited by a lack of representation. Patients who are older; live in rural locations; are uninsured; have co-morbid conditions; belong to minority groups; and are more likely to receive non-standard treatment are all inadequately represented in trials.
  • The NIH CARE for Health Initiative seeks to address these interrelated challenges. It will develop infrastructure for a clinical research network focused on primary care (PC); establish a foundation for sustained engagement with underrepresented communities; implement innovative study designs; integrate research into routine PC without increasing the burden on providers; and facilitate the adoption of evidence-based research findings.
  • CARE for Health is based in 6 national research hubs. One is the Primary Care Rural and Frontier Clinical Trials Innovation Center (PRaCTICe), a research network partnering with 300 PC practices serving 7 underrepresented population across Oregon, Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho.
  • PRaCTICe utilizes a continuum of community engagement, from outreach to shared leadership. Engagement strategies have included community needs assessment reviews, regional listening sessions, and a new study development process that involves co-designing studies with PRaCTICe partners.
  • In 2024, BeatPain a pragmatic, decentralized, NIH Collaboratory Trial was selected as 1 of 2 trials PRaCTICe would partner with during Year 1. By the presentation date, PRaCTICe had referred 165 patients to the BeatPain team, 95% of which were rural residents.
  • Rural populations simultaneously have higher incidence of chronic pain and are less likely to receive evidence-based, nonpharmacologic treatment for it. BeatPain seeks to serve this population by delivering physical therapy (PT) to federally qualified health center patients with lower back pain.
  • Over the course of their collaboration with PRaCTICe, BeatPain investigators have made strides in terms of localizing the study to partnering communities, building trust with referring providers and patients, and coordinating the end of the trial. Decentralized trial methods hold promise for engaging rural residents and clinics in clinical research.

Discussion Themes

Relationships between research staff and a variety of clinic staff were critical to effective engagement. In one example provided by Dr. Tong, staff helped identify which exercises were most effective when it came to getting providers interested in the referral process. Clinics were not passive recipients, but co-developers.

To deliver PT in a rural setting, the BeatPain team delivered a virtual intervention combining traditional PT, health coaching, motivational interviewing, and pain coping strategies. In some care processes, the hands-on component of PT is essential; less so for chronic pain. Strategic use of technology could expand access to nonpharmacologic care.

Research teams will need to be responsive to shifts in the capacity of rural hospitals and clinics due to funding cuts. This may look like designing interventions that don’t increase the burden on staff; supplying resources; and sharing strategies that clinics can use to be financially sustainable.

IT support proved central to the success of this partnered research. When clinic resources are constrained, the ability to help solve problems related to the electronic health record is essential.

October 8, 2025: Engaging Rural Communities in Pragmatic Clinical Trials, in This Week’s Rethinking Clinical Trials Grand Rounds

In this Friday's Rethinking Clinical Trials Grand Rounds, Julie Fritz of the University of Utah and Sebastian Tong of the University of Washington will present "Engaging Rural Communities in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Leveraging the CARE for Health Initiative Hubs to Enhance Enrollment for BeatPain."

The Grand Rounds session will be held on Friday, October 10, 2025, at 1:00 pm eastern.

BeatPain Utah, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, is comparing the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic intervention strategies for patients with back pain seeking care in federally qualified health centers throughout the state of Utah.

Fritz is the principal investigator for BeatPain Utah and a distinguished professor of physical therapy and athletic training at the University of Utah. Tong is a co–principal investigator for AIM-CP, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, and an associate professor of family medicine at the University of Washington.

Join the online meeting.

July 2, 2025: Researchers Share Tips for Embedding Pragmatic Trials Into Primary Care Settings

Headshots of Drs. Wendy Weber, Julie Fritz, Natalia Morone, and Sebastian TongAlthough the need for pragmatic research in primary care settings is great, conduct of pragmatic clinical trials in these settings remains nascent. In a session at the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory’s 2025 Annual Steering Committee Meeting, Wendy Weber of the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) led a discussion about how to expand pragmatic research into primary care settings.

The panelists included Julie Fritz, principal investigator (PI) for BeatPain Utah; Natalia Morone, PI for OPTIMUM; and Sebastian Tong, co-PI for AIM-CP. They shared some of the challenges of conducting research in primary care.

  • Primary care physicians have multiple competing demands for attention and focus, and a range of topics to cover in a single visit.
  • The expectation of being offered participation in clinical trials is lower in primary care than in specialty visits.
  • There are fewer resources that can be diverted to research in primary care, especially time and personnel.

Key Takeaways

How do we adapt pragmatic clinical trials to primary care?

Identify relevant and meaningful research questions

The panelists suggested that, when planning a trial, investigators should think about the primary care setting and consider what problems keep clinicians up at night. Research will be easier to implement if it helps alleviate these problems.

“In primary care, [primary care physicians] are looking at the entire person,” Tong said. “There has to be value added in how we care for the patients with the condition under study, either where the [physician] sees a difference in their patients’ lives or their own lives with respect to reduced burden,” he said.

The panelists also suggested that, for community health centers, there are certain conditions that are linked to data reporting standards, and aligning research with these standards will make studies easier to champion.

Adapt to different kinds of primary care settings

The panelists stressed the need for adaptably and flexibility in intervention delivery because all primary care settings are different. If  possible, researchers should tailor the workflow at each site in a way that is familiar to providers. the panelists also suggested that initial engagement by external researchers is best made with someone who is trusted at the site.

Some clinics, including community health centers, may be new to research and may need additional support. Many do not have an institutional review board or a Federalwide Assurance number, and many do not have experience using the electronic health record for research and developing data use agreements.

About the Trials

  • BeatPain Utah, supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), is comparing the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic interventions delivered via telehealth for patients with back pain seeking care in federally qualified health centers in Utah.
  • OPTIMUM, supported by NCCIH, is assessing the impact of a group-based mindfulness intervention for patients with chronic back pain under usual care circumstances in the primary care setting.
  • AIM-CP, supported by NINR, is testing the implementation of a care management program to address disparate access to nonpharmacological treatments for chronic pain in rural populations.

This summer, we are sharing highlights from the 2025 Annual Steering Committee Meeting.  Access the complete collection of meeting materials.

January 6, 2025: Fritz and Rhon to Present Strategies for Pain Management in the Military Health System

Headshots of Dr. Julie Fritz and Dr. Dan RhonIn an upcoming session of the VA Spotlight on Pain Management Cyberseminars series curated by the Pain Management Collaboratory (PMC), Julie Fritz and Dan Rhon will present “Supporting Whole Person Pain Management in the Military Health System.” The session will be held on Tuesday, January 7, from 11:00 am to 12:00 pm eastern.

Improving care for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain is a priority in the Military Health System. The Military Health System is supporting a shift towards more holistic, whole-person, approaches to pain management. The presenters of this seminar have been researching strategies to implement holistic pain management strategies in the Military Health System and evaluating ways to provide pain care that aligns with the DoD/VA Stepped Care Model for Pain Management.

Fritz is the principal investigator of BeatPain Utah, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, and is a distinguished professor of physical therapy and athletic training and the associate dean for research in the University of Utah’s College of Health. Rhon is a professor of rehabilitation medicine at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

Registration is required for participation this live web conference, but there is no cost. Continuing education credits are available for several disciplines for participants who are affiliated with the VA.

For more information, visit the Cyberseminar registration page.

About the PMC

The PMC is an important tri-government agency partnership involving the National Institutes of Health and Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs that supports a growing number of large-scale, multisite, pragmatic clinical trials of nonpharmacological approaches for the management of pain and common co-occurring conditions in military and Veteran health systems. Launched in 2017, the originally supported 11 pragmatic trials are nearing completion and are ready to present early findings, lessons learned in the conduct of the trials, and future directions and opportunities for implementation of important findings and products and for future research.

June 27, 2024: NIH HEAL Initiative Turns Attention to Pragmatic Trials in Rural Communities

Three of the newest NIH Collaboratory Trials are supported through the NIH HEAL Initiative℠, or Helping to End Addiction Long-Term Initiative℠, reflecting a special emphasis on developing strategies for the management of chronic pain in rural and remote populations.

“There are many known disparities between urban and rural populations,” said Karen Kehl, a program director at the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR). “And when we talk about chronic pain, we know that there’s a higher incidence and a higher severity of pain in rural populations, and yet they don’t have access to many of the effective solutions that we have,” Kehl added.

We recently spoke with Kehl, Julie Fritz of the BeatPain Utah trial, and the principal investigators of the AIM-CP, ARBOR-Telehealth, and RAMP trials at the NIH Collaboratory’s 2024 Annual Steering Committee Meeting. They discussed the progress of their studies and the importance of supporting healthcare and promoting health equity in rural communities through pragmatic research.

AIM-CP

AIM-CP will test the implementation of a care management program to address inequities in access to nonpharmacological treatment for chronic pain in rural populations. The principal investigators are Kushang Patel and Sebastian Tong of the University of Washington. The study is supported by NINR. Learn more about AIM-CP.

ARBOR-Telehealth

ARBOR-Telehealth will evaluate the use of a telehealth physical therapy strategy for patients who present to primary care clinics with low back pain in rural communities. The principal investigators are Richard Skolasky and Kevin McLaughlin of Johns Hopkins University. The study is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. Learn more about ARBOR-Telehealth.

RAMP

RAMP will evaluate the use of a 12-week mind-body skills training program for rural veterans with pain, including a one-on-one session with a “whole health coach” followed by 11 weekly group sessions to include prerecorded expert-led education videos, mind-body skills training and practice, and group discussions. The principal investigators are Diana Burgess and Roni Evans of the University of Minnesota and Katherine Hadlandsmyth of the University of Iowa. The study is supported by NINR. Learn more about RAMP.

Learn more about the NIH Collaboratory Trials.

Headshot of Dr. Julie Fritz

Reaching Rural Populations: BeatPain Utah

Reaching Rural Populations: BeatPain Utah

Description

Long-term solutions to disparities in health will involve focused partnerships and community engagement. In this video, the BeatPain Utah team shares their strategies for reaching and enrolling rural and frontier populations. Key characteristics of good partnerships are shared goals, mutual respect of expertise, and shared resources and data.

Speakers

Julie Fritz, PhD, PTHeadshot of Dr. Julie Fritz
Associate Dean for Research College of Health, School of Medicine, University of Utah
BeatPain Utah NIH Collaboratory Trial PI

David Wetter, PhD
Interim Chief, Division of Health System Innovation & Research, University of Utah

Related

Participant Recruitment

July 20, 2023: Latest Podcast Episode Features BeatPain Utah’s Julie Fritz

In a new episode of our Rethinking Clinical Trials podcast, Dr. Julie Fritz speaks with host Dr. Adrian Hernandez about partnering with community health centers in the BeatPain Utah study. Fritz and colleague Dr. Guilherme Del Fiol presented on their experiences during the June 16 session of Grand Rounds.

Listen to the latest podcast episode on SoundCloud or Apple Podcasts.

BeatPain Utah, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, is studying real-world implementation of a telehealth physical therapy strategy for patients with chronic back pain in primary care clinics of federally qualified health centers. The study is supported by the NIH through the NIH Heal Initiative under an award from the National Institute of Nursing Research.

Fritz, who is the principal investigator for BeatPain Utah, is a distinguished professor of physical therapy and athletic training at the University of Utah.

Listen and subscribe to the podcast on SoundCloud or Apple Podcasts, and view the full June 16 Grand Rounds webinar.

Grand Rounds June 16, 2023: BeatPain Utah: Partnering With Community Health Centers Within a Socio-Technical Framework (Julie Fritz, PT, PhD, FAPTA; Guilherme Del Fiol, MD, PhD)

Speakers

Julie Fritz, PT, PhD, FAPTA
Distinguished Professor, Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training
Associate Dean for Research, College of Health
University of Utah

Guilherme Del Fiol, MD, PhD
Professor, Biomedical Informatics
University of Utah

Keywords

Community Health Centers; Low Back Pain; Physical Therapy Modalities; Primary Care; Telemedicine

Key Points

  • Clinical practice guidelines support nonpharmacologic care as first-line management of low back pain. However, persons in low-income and rural communities have significantly higher odds of receiving a prescription opioid for a new back pain diagnosis.
  • Use of nonpharmacologic pain treatments is lower in rural settings and for persons of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Many of these communities are served by federally qualified health centers that often lack options to provide accessible nonpharmacologic alternatives.
  • Clinical research can exacerbate disparities, because clinical trials typically are based in urban, academic medical centers, underrepresent diverse populations, and overlook community engagement strategies in trial planning and design.
  • BeatPain Utah, an NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory Trial, is an embedded pragmatic clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic intervention strategies for patients with back pain seeking care in federally qualified health centers in Utah. The interventions include a telehealth strategy that provides a brief pain teleconsult along with phone-based physical therapy, and an adaptive strategy that provides the brief pain teleconsult first, followed by phone-based physical therapy among patients who are nonresponsive to treatment.
  • BeatPain Utah is using the Community-Engaged Dissemination and Implementation (CEDI) framework, which considers both social and technical factors in the implementation of health IT strategies, decentralizes the research methods and procedures, and grounds the implementation in a systematic, iterative mapping of how both clinic staff and patients interact with health IT.
  • Although there is evidence of a significant divide in the implementation of advanced health IT functions, low-resource settings can adopt advanced health IT with some assistance. Moreover, there is considerable opportunity to reduce inequities through increased adoption of telehealth strategies, given that 96% of people in low-resource communities have at least a text and voice phone.

Discussion Themes

  • Motivating patients to engage in self-management of health conditions is a challenge, irrespective of whether the intervention is delivered in person or remotely.
  • Designing interventions that can meet everyone’s needs can be a challenge in a study that involves rural/urban and racial/ethnic diversity. Implementation mapping at the beginning of the design process is key. This includes direct assessment of patients’ needs, such as by interviewing patients who seek care in the partnering clinics to understand their expectations and how they would think about a mode of care delivery, like telehealth, that is unfamiliar to them.
  • Another crucial element of the health equity–focused model is ensuring that the question at the heart of the research is of value to the clinics and their leadership. For every trial, one of the first important tasks is to reach out to the community health center leadership and see if they are interested. The clinic’s priorities should drive the design of the trial. “We have to be very accommodating to the needs of each [community health center] and respect their needs.”
  • How quickly can these types of studies proceed from trial completion to release of results? Especially in studies involving chronic conditions, having long-term follow-up data to answer the core effectiveness question in a hybrid trial means there could be a long wait for results. Researchers must also be prepared to consider the question of sustaining a service that many clinics in the study have come to rely on, even before the results are available.

Tags

#pctGR, @Collaboratory1