patient-centered outcomes research

August 28, 2020: Designing, Conducting, Monitoring, and Analyzing Data from Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Proceedings from a Multi-Stakeholder Think Tank Meeting (Trevor Lentz, PT, PhD, MHA; Lesley Curtis, PhD; Frank Rockhold, PhD)

Posted on by Gina Uhlenbrauck

Speakers

Trevor Lentz, PT, PhD, MHA
Assistant Professor in Orthopaedic Surgery
Duke Clinical Research Institute

Lesley Curtis, PhD
Chair and Professor, Department of Population Health Sciences
Duke University School of Medicine

Frank Rockhold, PhD, ScM, FASA, FSCT
Professor of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
Duke Clinical Research Institute

Topic

Designing, Conducting, Monitoring, and Analyzing Data from Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Proceedings from a Multi-Stakeholder Think Tank Meeting

Keywords

Pragmatic clinical trials; Think tank; Risk-based monitoring; Data quality; Real-world data; Electronic health records

Key Points

  • Pragmatism in study design is not a binary concept: some trial elements are purely explanatory (to establish efficacy in ideal settings) and some elements are purely practical (to establish effectiveness in the real world). The study design must serve the research question.
  • Findings from the think tank discussions on best practices and actionable steps included:
    • Ask precise research questions, and select the appropriate degree of pragmatism.
    • Optimize data quality through study design.
    • Focus on primary endpoints in data capture to maximize likelihood of success.
    • Innovate on mechanisms for data capture.
    • Promote adherence to the study protocol.
    • Evolve trial operations staff to focus on data science and informatics.
    • Share learning experiences openly and widely.

Discussion Themes

There is a misconception that PCTs, because they pursue pragmatism, are less rigorous and conducted without proper oversight or adherence to a protocol. Quality by design and good clinical practice principles apply equally to PCTs.

Risk-based monitoring is a potentially dynamic system that could improve study safety and quality, and make better use of study resources.

There is great interest from regulators, sponsors, and the academic research community to move PCT methods forward. To achieve this, we need to see more examples of successful PCTs in a context of regulatory decision-making.

Read the proceedings from the think tank meeting published in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science.

Tags

#pctGR, @Collaboratory1

August 21, 2020: Adaptive Platform Trials: Scalable from Breast Cancer to COVID (Laura Esserman, MD, MBA)

Posted on by Gina Uhlenbrauck

Speaker

Laura Esserman, MD, MBA
Director, UCSF Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center
Alfred A. de Lorimier Endowed Chair in General Surgery
Professor of Surgery and Radiology, UCSF

Topic

Adaptive Platform Trials: Scalable from Breast Cancer to COVID

Keywords

COVID-19; Adaptive platform trial; Study design; Learning healthcare system; Collaborative research

Key Points

  • Adaptive trial design is an innovative, collaborative approach with the potential to maximize learning about treatments so as to prioritize therapeutic agents and drive better patient outcomes.
  • Adaptive platform trials are designed to identify early endpoints that can be captured in the course of care. Multiple agents are evaluated simultaneously, and those with a potential for big impact are advanced quickly.
  • As a “learning engine,” adaptive platform trials could be used to accelerate high-impact treatments for COVID-19 and future pandemics.

Discussion Themes

Essential to an adaptive platform trial are checklists of data and nimble EHR tools that evolve as the disease evolves.

What is the process to monitor for and make the decision to modify the standard of care backbone?

Read more about adaptive platform trials at the I-SPY Trials website and a recent Grand Rounds presentation, Optimized Learning While Doing: The REMAP-CAP Adaptive Platform Trial.

Tags

#pctGR, @Collaboratory1

August 18, 2020: Grand Rounds Podcast With C. Michael Gibson on the Democratization of Medicine Is Available

Posted on by Gina Uhlenbrauck

In the latest episode of the NIH Collaboratory Grand Rounds podcast, Dr. Adrian Hernandez and Dr. C. Michael Gibson continue the discussion of how medicine and medical research are being transformed through patient empowerment and information sharing. Their conversation provides a deeper look into the power of social media and the role of physicians as citizen journalists, innovators, activists, and educators. The full August 7 Grand Rounds webinar with Dr. Gibson is also available.

August 11, 2020: Grand Rounds Webinar Discusses the Democratization of Medical Research

Posted on by Gina Uhlenbrauck

A recent Grand Rounds webinar presented by C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD, described how open access, patient empowerment, social media, and digital health are transforming clinical trials. Dr. Gibson is a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and president and CEO of Baim and PERFUSE Research Institutes.

Among the key points:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has been a call to arms to physicians to combat not only the virus but the misinformation.
  • As the internet is replacing the printing press, “copyleft” is replacing copyright in this new open-access era. It is a participatory community with bidirectional flow of information through social media.
  • Health data does not equal health care. Patients are looking to physicians to curate health information.
  • In this new world of clinical research, patients are enrolling in virtual trials via a phone app and will be followed up online through claims data and patient-reported outcomes.
  • Patient-empowered trials have the potential to provide more generalizable study results and to lead to patient-specific predictions through use of artificial intelligence.

Watch the complete webinar and download the slides.

Read more in The Democratization of Medical Research and Education Through Social Media: The Potential and the Peril (Gibson, JAMA Cardiology, 2017) and learn about the Heartline Study as an example of a “giga trial.”

August 7, 2020: The Democratization of Medicine: Open Access, Social Media, AI, Apps, and Empowering the Patient as the Future of Clinical Research (C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD)

Posted on by Gina Uhlenbrauck

Speaker

C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD
Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
President and CEO
Baim and PERFUSE Research Institutes

Topic

The Democratization of Medicine: Open Access, Social Media, AI, Apps, and Empowering the Patient as the Future of Clinical Research

Keywords

Clinical research; Open access; Social media; Artificial intelligence; Heartline study; WikiDoc; WikiPatient

Key Points

  • As the internet is replacing the printing press, “copyleft” is replacing copyright in the open-access era. It is a participatory community with bidirectional flow of information through social media.
  • Health data does not equal health care. Patients are looking to physicians to curate health information from huge volumes of data.
  • Social media and open access during the COVID-19 pandemic has meant that physicians are citizen journalists, innovators, activists, and educators.
  • In this new world, patients are enrolling in virtual trials via a phone app and will be followed up online through claims data and patient-reported outcomes.

Discussion Themes

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a call to arms to clinicians to combat not only the virus but the misinformation. As educators we must set the path and not allow uninformed people to take control.

Enabling patient-empowered trials has the potential for more generalizable study results and can lead to patient-specific predictions through use of artificial intelligence.

How do we validate the quality of open-access data and reports that are not peer-reviewed?

How can we diminish the hazards of skewed research outcomes arising from trial participant conversations on social media?

Read more from C. Michael Gibson in The Democratization of Medical Research and Education Through Social Media: The Potential and the Peril (JAMA Cardiology 2017).

Tags

#pctGR, @Collaboratory1

August 4, 2020: New Living Textbook Sections Describe Interoperability, Patient Access to Data

Posted on by Karen Staman

Members of the NIH Collaboratory Electronic Health Records Core have authored 2 new sections of the Living Textbook chapter Using Electronic Health Record Data in Pragmatic Clinical Trials:

  • Interoperability
    • This section describes efforts to support interoperability and the sharing of patient data across care teams and organizations, including the creation the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) standard.
  • Patient Access to Data
    • This section describes provisions of the 21st Century Cures Act intended to support the access, exchange, and use of electronic health information by patients and their caregivers.

Many of the NIH Collaboratory Trials use electronic health record and claims data for pragmatic research, and these data are from a fundamentally different context than data prospectively collected for more traditional, explanatory research. The Living Textbook chapter, Using Electronic Health Record Data in Pragmatic Clinical Trials, describes how data from real-world sources can be used in pragmatic clinical trials to develop and refine research questions, identify the study population and assess baseline prognostic characteristics, implement and monitor the delivery of the intervention, and assess outcomes.

The 2 new sections describe the latest developments and considerations for use of electronic health data in pragmatic clinical trials.

July 24, 2020: TENS in Fibromyalgia: From Fundamental Neurobiology to Pragmatic Trial (Leslie J. Crofford, MD; Kathleen Sluka, PT, PhD)

Posted on by Gina Uhlenbrauck

Speakers

Leslie J. Crofford, MD
Wilson Family Chair and Professor of Medicine
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Kathleen Sluka, PT, PhD
Kate Daum Research Professor
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science
University of Iowa

Topic

TENS in Fibromyalgia: From Fundamental Neurobiology to Pragmatic Trial

Keywords

Fibromyalgia; Musculoskeletal pain; Neuropathic pain; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); Physical therapy; Nonpharmacologic pain treatment; PRISM; Patient-reported outcomes (PROs)

Key Points

  • Fibromyalgia (FM) is a condition of widespread pain that is worsened with physical activity. It involves chronic musculoskeletal and visceral pain and is often accompanied by fatigue, depression, or anxiety.
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a technique that uses a device to deliver an electric impulse through the skin. Treatment with TENS has been shown to improve resting and movement-evoked pain and fatigue.
  • While physical therapists generally are trained in the use of TENS, the technique remains underused in clinical practice.
  • The goal of the FM TIPS pragmatic trial is to determine, in a real-world clinical setting, whether physical therapy combined with TENS for patients with FM is more effective than physical therapy alone. The study is being piloted in 24 sites across 5 physical therapy health systems.

Discussion Themes

While COVID-19 has had an impact on piloting the FM TIPS study, some kind of physical therapy will be possible through telemedicine. Other challenges include that conducting embedded research in physical therapy clinics is new, and there are multiple different EHR systems in use across the partnering clinics.

The recently published results from Fibromyalgia Activity Study With TENS (FAST) showed that TENS can be safely used in addition to other treatments to improve pain and fatigue in women with fibromyalgia in the setting of a randomized controlled trial.

Read more about the Fibromyalgia TENS in Physical Therapy Study (FM TIPS) NIH Collaboratory Trial and watch a brief interview with the PIs of the study.

FM TIPS is one of the NIH HEAL Initiative’s PRISM (Pragmatic and Implementation Studies for the Management of Pain to Reduce Opioid Prescribing) studies.

Tags

#pctGR, @Collaboratory1

July 27, 2020: ADAPTABLE Roundtable Produces Consensus Statement on Capturing Patient-Reported Health Data in Clinical Trials

Posted on by Damon Seils

A new report from an NIH Collaboratory roundtable discussion held in 2017 discusses considerations for the capture of patient-reported health (PRH) data in clinical trials. The report is part of an effort by the ADAPTABLE Supplement project team “to address best practices for capturing PRH data in pragmatic studies and optimal analytic approaches for integrating PRH with other data sources.”

The statement was published online ahead of print this month in Healthcare.

The new consensus statement is the second report from the ADAPTABLE roundtable. A statement published in February offered guidance for the analysis and integration of PRH data in clinical trials.

ADAPTABLE, the first major randomized comparative effectiveness trial conducted by the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), seeks to determine the optimal dose of aspirin therapy for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The trial relies on both existing EHR data sources and PRH data.

This work was supported by a supplemental grant award to the NIH Collaboratory Coordinating Center from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health.

June 12, 2020: A Cluster Randomized Pragmatic Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents: Main Findings from the PROVEN Trial (Susan Mitchell, MD, MPH)

Posted on by Gina Uhlenbrauck

Speaker

Susan L. Mitchell, MD, MPH
Senior Scientist
Hebrew SeniorLife
Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research
Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School

Topic

A Cluster Randomized Pragmatic Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents: Main Findings from the PROVEN Trial

Keywords

Embedded pragmatic trial; PROVEN; Advance care planning; Nursing homes; Video intervention; Medicare; Care preferences; Decision support tool; Minimum data set; Intention to treat

Key Points

  • The PROVEN trial was the first large-scale embedded pragmatic trial conducted in nursing homes.
  • The advance care planning (ACP) video intervention in PROVEN was meant as an adjunct to first-person discussions with the clinical care provider.
  • The levels of care preferences described in the ACP videos were life prolongation, limited care, and comfort care.
  • PROVEN’s primary outcome was the number of transfers to the hospital from the nursing home.

Discussion Themes

Widely adoptable, effective interventions to improve ACP in nursing homes remain elusive.

Of the challenges of conducting PCTs embedded in nursing homes, it is important not to overlook the real-world priorities of stakeholders. A high level of endorsement, from C-suite to frontline care providers, is needed before attempting such a trial.

While a priority for nursing home administrators is the number of residents who transfer to the hospital, an essential question for patients and palliative care experts is whether patients receive care that matches their goals and preferences. This is hard to ascertain in a pragmatic way.

Read more about the PROVEN trial, and learn about a new research initiative built on the success of the NIH Collaboratory: the National Institute on Aging’s IMPACT Collaboratory, which is directly funding pilots of embedded PCTs across diverse healthcare settings to improve the care of patients with dementia and their caregivers.

Tags

#pctGR, @Collaboratory1

June 4, 2020: New Chapter in the Living Textbook Describes the Uses and How-tos of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Posted on by Karen Staman

A new chapter in the Living Textbook describes how patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in different settings and how to choose and integrate PRO measures into an embedded pragmatic clinical trial.

The chapter also characterizes PRO use within the PRISM program (Pragmatic and Implementation Studies for the Management of Pain to Reduce Opioid Prescribing) of the NIH HEAL Initiative (Helping End Addiction Long-term Initiative). NIH Collaboratory Trials supported through the PRISM program include:

AcuOA: Pragmatic Trial of Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults
FM TIPS: Fibromyalgia TENS in Physical Therapy Study
NOHARM: Non-pharmacological Options in Postoperative Hospital-Based and Rehabilitation Pain Management
OPTIMUM: Group-based mindfulness for patients with chronic low back pain in the primary care setting

The main topics of the chapter are:

The authors also include Core Outcome Sets for chronic pain, low back pain, musculoskeletal pain, and cancer.