In a new episode of the Rethinking Clinical Trials Podcast, Shruti Gohil and Jeffrey Guy discussed key takeaways from “INtelligent Stewardship Prompts to Improve Real-time Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients,” also known as the INSPIRE trial.
Listen to the podcast. For alerts about new episodes, subscribe for free on Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, or SoundCloud.
INSPIRE, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, involved more than 300,000 patients in 92 HCA Healthcare hospitals. In half of the hospitals, clinicians received computerized alerts with information about the best antibiotic match for non-critically ill patients with abdominal or skin and soft tissue infection.
“Typically, these are engagements that create some sort of friction or that slow the tempo of care down. There was no slowing of the care tempo and it wasn’t creating friction, which I felt led to greater clinician adoption,” Guy said.
The study team found a 35% improvement in antibiotic selection for abdominal infection patients and a 28% improvement for skin and soft tissue infection patients. The magnitude of the effect exceeded the INSPIRE team’s expectations, and Guy and Gohil each shared insights into the drivers of the intervention’s success.
“This wasn’t just any other prompt physicians are used to seeing – Best Practice Alerts and alerts where you don’t get information back. This was a prompt that was developed to give clinicians information. What the trials show is that when you give clinicians meaningful information, you get results that can be quite powerful,” Gohil said.
INSPIRE was supported within the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The primary results were reported this year in JAMA Internal Medicine and JAMA Surgery.
Gohil is a co-principal investigator for INSPIRE and assistant professor of infectious diseases at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine. Guy is the Corporate Vice President of Care Process Design at HCA Healthcare.
In 2025, NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory investigators published new study designs and trial results, shared insights from program leadership, and developed innovative methods in the design, conduct, implementation, and dissemination of pragmatic clinical trials. Their work included perspectives from the Coordinating Center, best practices from the
A new analysis from the INSPIRE research team found that automated prompts to improve judicious use of antibiotics for hospitalized patients led to sustained reductions in the use of extended-spectrum antibiotics.
Pragmatic clinical trials are conducted as part of routine healthcare delivery and often compare an intervention to usual care. To do this, researchers must understand, monitor, and document standard care at participating research sites.
A key feature of the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory is its culture of learning and knowledge sharing among investigators who are planning and conducting pragmatic clinical trials. In a session at the program’s 






