December 31, 2025: New Podcast Explores INSPIRE Trial Results and Drivers of Intervention Success

In a new episode of the Rethinking Clinical Trials Podcast, Shruti Gohil and Jeffrey Guy discussed key takeaways from “INtelligent Stewardship Prompts to Improve Real-time Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients,” also known as the INSPIRE trial.

Listen to the podcast. For alerts about new episodes, subscribe for free on Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, or SoundCloud.

INSPIRE, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, involved more than 300,000 patients in 92 HCA Healthcare hospitals. In half of the hospitals, clinicians received computerized alerts with information about the best antibiotic match for non-critically ill patients with abdominal or skin and soft tissue infection.

“Typically, these are engagements that create some sort of friction or that slow the tempo of care down. There was no slowing of the care tempo and it wasn’t creating friction, which I felt led to greater clinician adoption,” Guy said.

The study team found a 35% improvement in antibiotic selection for abdominal infection patients and a 28% improvement for skin and soft tissue infection patients. The magnitude of the effect exceeded the INSPIRE team’s expectations, and Guy and Gohil each shared insights into the drivers of the intervention’s success.

“This wasn’t just any other prompt physicians are used to seeing – Best Practice Alerts and alerts where you don’t get information back. This was a prompt that was developed to give clinicians information. What the trials show is that when you give clinicians meaningful information, you get results that can be quite powerful,” Gohil said.

INSPIRE was supported within the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The primary results were reported this year in JAMA Internal Medicine and JAMA Surgery.

Gohil is a co-principal investigator for INSPIRE and assistant professor of infectious diseases at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine. Guy is the Corporate Vice President of Care Process Design at HCA Healthcare.

Podcast December 18, 2025: INSPIRE (Shruti Gohil, MD, MPH; Jeffrey Guy, MD, MSc, MMHC)

In this episode of the NIH Collaboratory Podcast, Drs. Shruti Gohil and Jeffrey Guy discuss key takeaways from “INtelligent Stewardship Prompts to Improve Real-time Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients,” also known as the INSPIRE trial.

Transcript coming soon. For alerts about new episodes, subscribe for free on Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, or SoundCloud.

December 15, 2025: A Year of Trial Results and Innovations From the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory

A collage of journal covers with the label "NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory 2025 Publications Roundup"In 2025, NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory investigators published new study designs and trial results, shared insights from program leadership, and developed innovative methods in the design, conduct, implementation, and dissemination of pragmatic clinical trials. Their work included perspectives from the Coordinating Center, best practices from the Core Working Groups, and results from the NIH Collaboratory Trials.

The program contributed 45 articles to the peer-reviewed literature this year, including the primary results of the ACP PEACE, BackInAction, HiLo, INSPIRE, and PRIM‑ER trials. Cross-Core and cross-Trial collaborations led to the sharing of important lessons from the conduct of multiple NIH Collaboratory Trials.

The total number of published articles from the program reached 386.

Coordinating Center

Cross-Core and Cross-Trial Collaborations

Distributed Research Network

Core Working Groups

Biostatistics and Study Design Core

Community Health Improvement Core

Electronic Health Records Core

Ethics and Regulatory Core

Health Care Systems Interactions Core

Patient-Centered Outcomes Core

NIH Collaboratory Trials

ABATE Infection

ACP PEACE

ARBOR-Telehealth

BackInAction

BeatPain Utah

BEST-ICU

EMBED

FM-TIPS

GGC4H

GRACE

HiLo

I CAN DO Surgical ACP

IMPACt-LBP

INSPIRE

iPATH

LIRE

MOMs Chat & Care Study

NOHARM

Nudge

OPTIMUM

PRIM-ER

SPOT

TAICHIKNEE

August 19, 2025: INSPIRE Sees Sustained Reductions in Use of Extended-Spectrum Antibiotics

Logo for the INSPIRE Demonstration ProjectA new analysis from the INSPIRE research team found that automated prompts to improve judicious use of antibiotics for hospitalized patients led to sustained reductions in the use of extended-spectrum antibiotics.

The findings were reported in a research letter in JAMA.

INSPIRE, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, consisted of 2 cluster randomized trials that used personalized clinical decision support to improve judicious antibiotic prescribing for non–critically ill hospitalized patients with abdominal or skin and soft tissue infections during the first 3 days of hospitalization. The research program also included 2 other trials, which evaluated the same intervention for hospitalized patients with pneumonia and urinary tract infection.

In the new analysis, 65% to 84% of the reductions achieved in the use of extended-spectrum antibiotics in the first 3 days of hospitalization persisted through the remainder of the hospital stay.

“These findings suggest that investing in stewardship for initial antibiotic selection, rather than primarily focusing on de-escalating antibiotics once started, would reduce unnecessary extended-spectrum antibiotics for millions of patients in US hospitals annually,” the authors wrote.

INSPIRE was supported within the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The primary results were reported this year in JAMA Internal Medicine and JAMA Surgery.

Learn more about INSPIRE.

July 31, 2025: Pragmatic Trialists Share Strategies for Monitoring Changes in Usual Care

Pragmatic clinical trials are conducted as part of routine healthcare delivery and often compare an intervention to usual care. To do this, researchers must understand, monitor, and document standard care at participating research sites.

At the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory’s 2025 Annual Steering Committee Meeting, Duke University’s Emily O’Brian asked a panel of trialists about the strategies they used to define and document usual care. The panelists included Rachel Winer, co–principal investigator (PI) of STEP-2;, Richard Platt, co-PI of INSPIRE; and Christine Goertz, co-PI of IMPACt-LBP.

Key Strategies

  • Establish a community of individuals who are interested in and committed to answering the research question
  • Develop relationships: visit each site and have monthly coaching calls
  • Get commitment in advance from sites to hold their practice constant for the duration of the trial
  • Have sites complete readiness surveys or feasibility assessments that include questions about potential upcoming quality improvement initiatives
  • Minimize burden on sites as much as possible

The Navigating the Unknown chapter of the Living Textbook includes  descriptions of unanticipated challenges that may occur during the years-long course of a study that can have profound effects on usual care, including:

These challenges all require close collaboration with research partners to develop solutions.

This summer, we are sharing highlights from the 2025 Annual Steering Committee Meeting. Access the complete collection of meeting materials.

July 1, 2025: As Their Studies Wrap Up, Researchers Share Lessons for Pragmatic Trials

Headshots of Drs. Christine Goertz, Andrea Cook, Shruti Gohil, and Stacy SterlingA key feature of the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory is its culture of learning and knowledge sharing among investigators who are planning and conducting pragmatic clinical trials. In a session at the program’s 2025 Annual Steering Committee Meeting, a panel of investigators discussed their recently completed NIH Collaboratory Trials and their thoughts about future directions for pragmatic research.

The panelists included Andrea Cook, co–principal investigator (PI) for BackInAction; Shruti Gohil, lead investigator for INSPIRE; and Stacy Sterling, co-PI for GGC4H. Christine Goertz, a co-PI for IMPACt-LBP, moderated the discussion.

Key Takeaways

What do investigators wish they had known before starting a pragmatic trial? Sterling highlighted a need for ongoing engagement with partnering healthcare systems’ senior leaders to ensure they understand the challenges of adopting and sustaining the study intervention. Cook stressed the importance of educating site personnel about what it means to participate in the trial, including the potential for randomization to a usual care arm.

“We also included nonphysician clinicians in the education about the intervention, because they are often doing the steps being targeted by the intervention,” Gohil added.

How can we apply these lessons in future pragmatic trials? “Doing an embedded pragmatic trial is sort of like having a child: You really need the guidance of people who have gone before you and have real-life experience,” Goertz said.

The panelists proposed the development of more standardized materials for the consent process and other trial elements. They also discussed the need for broader dissemination strategies and new ways to promote implementation tools from trials with successful interventions.

Gohil described her research team’s commitment to developing a dissemination toolkit so people will understand how to approach implementation. She noted that, as soon as the trial was completed but before publication, the research team presented the results to the participating sites.

Greg Simon, the PI for SPOT and a member of the NIH Collaboratory Coordinating Center’s leadership team, stressed the importance of including research partners in dissemination.

“Don’t write the discussion section [of your study results paper] until you’ve talked with your healthcare system partners; they might have something to teach us about what the results mean,” he said.

About the Trials

  • BackInAction, supported by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), is comparing standard and advanced courses of acupuncture with usual care for older adults with chronic low back pain.
  • GGC4H, supported by NCCIH, is testing the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing within healthcare systems the Guiding Good Choices program for caregivers of early adolescents to prevent common behavioral problems, such as substance use.
  • IMPACt-LBP, supported by NCCIH, is evaluating the effect of first-contact patient referral to physical therapists and doctors of chiropractic for low back pain.
  • INSPIRE, supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, used personalized clinical decision support to improve judicious antibiotic prescribing for non–critically ill patients hospitalized with abdominal infections or skin and soft tissue infections.
  • SPOT, supported by the National Institute of Mental Health, compared care management and dialectical behavior therapy skills training to usual care for adults at risk of self-harm or suicidal behavior.

This summer, we are sharing highlights from the 2025 Annual Steering Committee Meeting. Access the complete collection of meeting materials.

April 14, 2025: In INSPIRE Trials, Automated Prompts Reduced Unnecessary Prescribing of Extended-Spectrum Antibiotics

Headshot of Dr. Shruti Gohil
Dr. Shruti Gohil

A program that used automated prompts to deliver patient-specific risk information to clinicians led to significant reductions in the use of extended-spectrum antibiotics for hospitalized patients, according to the INSPIRE trials.

The results of the trials were published online ahead of print in JAMA Internal Medicine and JAMA Surgery.

INSPIRE, an NIH Collaboratory Trial, consists of 2 cluster randomized trials that used personalized clinical decision support to improve judicious antibiotic prescribing for non–critically ill hospitalized patients with abdominal or skin and soft tissue infections.

Although fewer than 5% of such patients have an antibiotic-resistant infection, more than half receive extended-spectrum antibiotics. Tools to support judicious antibiotic prescribing are needed to curb the public health threat of antibiotic resistance. More than 2.8 million antimicrobial-resistant infections occur each year in the United States alone, and more than 35,000 people die as a result, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Conducted at 92 hospitals in the United States, INSPIRE compared routine care under hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs with an enhanced program that added a predictive algorithm to reduce unnecessary prescribing of extended-spectrum antibiotics. The computerized provider order entry system at the intervention sites notified physicians when the antibiotic they selected was discordant with the estimated need for that antibiotic.

Logo for the INSPIRE Demonstration ProjectIn the skin and soft tissue infections trial, which included 60,725 patients, the automated prompts reduced the use of empiric extended-spectrum antibiotics targeting Pseudomonas and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria by 28% without increasing intensive care unit admissions or hospital length of stay. Read the full report in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Likewise, in the abdominal infection trial, among 105,004 patients, the prompts led to a 35% relative reduction in empiric extended-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy without increasing intensive care unit transfers or length of stay. Read the full report in JAMA Surgery.

In an invited commentary accompanying the JAMA Surgery report, Joshua Brown of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center wrote, “Now that Gohil and colleagues have shown efficacy of their intervention, the next big question is how well it will scale to be implemented broadly.”

“These trials represent a major step forward for the field of antibiotic stewardship,” wrote Shinya Hasegawa and Daniel Livorsi of University of Iowa Health Care in an editorial in JAMA Network Open. “By next exploring the why behind the bundle’s success, strategies to replicate INSPIRE can be developed and tailored to a variety of hospital settings.”

Headshot of Dr. Susan Huang
Dr. Susan Huang

Headshot of Dr. Richard Platt
Dr. Richard Platt

INSPIRE is supported within the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Shruti Gohil of the University of California, Irvine, is INSPIRE’s lead investigator. Susan Huang of UC Irvine and Richard Platt of the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute are the co–principal investigators.

Learn more about INSPIRE.

May 29, 2024: INSPIRE Pragmatic Trial to Be Featured in This Week’s PCT Grand Rounds

Headshot of Dr. Shruti Gohil
Dr. Shruti Gohil

In this Friday’s PCT Grand Rounds, Shruti Gohil of the University of California, Irvine, will present “The INSPIRE Abdominal and Skin/Soft Tissue Infection Trials: Intelligent Stewardship Prompts to Improve Real-Time Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients.”

The Grand Rounds session will be held on Friday, May 31, 2024, at 1:00 pm eastern.

Gohil is an assistant professor of medicine and the associate medical director of epidemiology and infection prevention at the UC Irvine School of Medicine. She is the lead investigator for INSPIRE, an NIH Collaboratory Trial.

Join the online meeting.

June 14, 2023: IMPACt-LBP and INSPIRE Have Updated Study Snapshots, Ethics and Regulatory Documentation

Updated study snapshots and ethics and regulatory documentation are now available for the IMPACt-LBP and INSPIRE trials, both NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory Trials.

Logo for the IMPACt-LBP NIH Collaboratory TrialIMPACt-LBP transitioned from the planning phase to the implementation phase in August. As part of the transition, the study team reviewed and updated the minutes of their initial consultation with the Ethics and Regulatory Core. The study is a cluster randomized trial evaluating the effect of first-contact patient referral to physical therapists and doctors of chiropractic for the treatment of low back pain. IMPACt-LBP is supported within the NIH Collaboratory under an award from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health.

  • Also available is an updated study snapshot for IMPACt-LBP.

Logo for the INSPIRE NIH Collaboratory TrialINSPIRE joined the NIH Collaboratory at the beginning of its implementation phase. The study team held its initial consultation with the Ethics Regulatory Core to review their approach to consent, data privacy, and the applicability of recent FDA guidance regarding clinical decision support software functions. INSPIRE consists of 2 cluster randomized trials that are using personalized clinical decision support to improve judicious antibiotic prescribing for non–critically ill patients hospitalized with abdominal infections or skin and soft tissue infections. The project is supported within the NIH Collaboratory under an award from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

  • See also the study snapshot for INSPIRE.

June 6, 2023: INSPIRE NIH Collaboratory Trial Principal Investigators Share Update at Annual Steering Committee Meeting

In an interview at the annual NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory Steering Committee meeting in Bethesda, Maryland, Richard Platt, MD, MS (co–principal investigator) and Shruti Gohil, MD, MPH (lead investigator) of the INSPIRE NIH Collaboratory Trial shared the status of the trials, discussed recent lessons learned, described the impact they hope their trials will have on the future of healthcare, and reflected on the impact the NIH Collaboratory has had on their trials thus far.

Status Update

Headshot of Dr. Richard Platt
Richard Platt, MD

Shruti Gohil, MD, MPH

INSPIRE (or Intelligent Stewardship Prompts to Improve Real-Time Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients) is implementing 2 separate cluster-randomized trials to study the effectiveness of a patient/infection/hospital-specific clinical decision support program in improving antibiotic prescribing for non–critically ill patients who are hospitalized with abdominal infections or skin and soft tissue infections. The purpose of the trials is to reduce unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use in non–intensive care unit inpatients.

The 12-month trial is currently in month 5, and the team has already seen a downward inflection in broad-spectrum antibiotic use.

Lessons Learned

Due to the urgent public health threat of antibiotic resistance, healthcare systems are actively seeking ways to support clinicians in judicious antibiotic prescribing. As a result, although the target recruitment was 60 hospitals out of approximately 200, 92 hospitals at HCA Healthcare requested enrollment.

"We have the privilege of being with a health system that has a strong leadership structure that is patient-safety oriented, and quality improvement is a top-notch priority," Gohil said, describing the unusual overenrollment.

The INSPIRE team determined that the trial could be shortened from 18 months to 12 by using all 92 hospitals.

"We determined that the higher number of hospitals wanting to participate gave us the opportunity to understand the usefulness of this decision support tool as quickly as possible and honor the commitment of the partner health system," Platt said. "Their view is, if it works, we want to use it everywhere as soon as possible," he said.

Impact of the Trial on Real-World Healthcare

Dr. Gohil explained that she hopes not only to reduce unnecessary prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics, but also to learn about how digital health can transform healthcare and its delivery.

“We have a tool that not only flags a low-risk patient, but is doing it based on data from the [electronic medical record] system, and is calculating risk specific to a patient, specific to a disease, and specific to a type of bacteria, and one that is unique to a hospital. It captures all that information and presents it to a clinician to make good judgments about antibiotic selection,” Gohil said. She hopes this work will be a step towards future systems that could be “savvy enough and real-time enough deliver high precision care tailored for individual patients as  part of an embedded learning system.”

Impact of the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory on INSPIRE

The INSPIRE intervention includes a clinical decision support tool to help clinicians make a guideline-concordant decision on antibiotic use based on a patient's personalized risk. At the time of the trial’s launch, the FDA introduced a new guidance on Clinical Decision Support Software to support determinations regarding whether a software would be considered a device and therefore subject to FDA oversight.

“It was really helpful to have the Ethics and Regulatory Core do a deep dive with us on the FDA guidance on clinical decision support and help determine that our software was not considered a device,” Platt said.

The INSPIRE NIH Collaboratory Trial is supported within the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

All of the materials from the 2023 Steering Committee meeting are now available.