Skip to content

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
  • Home
  • About
    • NIH Collaboratory
      • Coordinating Center
      • NIH Collaboratory Trials
      • Core Working Groups
      • Steering Committee
      • Distributed Research Network
      • Our Impact
    • Living Textbook
      • Table of Contents
      • How to Use This Site
  • Resources
    • Data and Resource Sharing
    • Training Resources
    • Tools for Researchers
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Repository
  • Webinar
  • Podcast
  • News
    • News Feed
    • Calendar
    • Subscribe
return to home
Subscribe to Newsletter go to twitter feed go to linkedin go to blue sky feed
Search
NIH Collaboratory
Living Textbook of
Pragmatic Clinical Trials

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
home button

Rethinking Clinical Trials

A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials

  • Design
    • What is a Pragmatic Clinical Trial?
    • Decentralized Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Developing a Compelling Grant Application
    • Experimental Designs and Randomization Schemes
    • Endpoints and Outcomes
    • Analysis Plan
    • Using Electronic Health Record Data
    • Building Partnerships and Teams to Ensure a Successful Trial
    • Intervention Delivery and Complexity
    • Patient Engagement
  • Data, Tools & Conduct
    • Assessing Feasibility
    • Acquiring Real-World Data
    • Assessing Fitness-for-Use of Real-World Data
    • Study Startup
    • Participant Recruitment
    • Monitoring Intervention Fidelity and Adaptations
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Mobile Health
    • Electronic Health Records–Based Phenotyping
    • Navigating the Unknown
  • Dissemination & Implementation
    • Data Sharing and Embedded Research
    • Dissemination Approaches for Different Audiences
    • Implementation
    • End-of-Trial Decision-Making
  • Ethics & Regulatory
    • Privacy Considerations
    • Identifying Those Engaged in Research
    • Collateral Findings
    • Consent, Disclosure, and Non-Disclosure
    • Data and Safety Monitoring
    • Ethical Considerations of Data Sharing in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Ethics for AI and ML
    • IRB Responsibilities and Procedures

Key Principles of Patient Engagement

CHAPTER SECTIONS

Patient Engagement


Section 2

Key Principles of Patient Engagement

Expand Contributors

Steven Z. George, PT, PhD

Contributing Editor

Hannah Webster, MPH

Gina Uhlenbrauck

Karen Staman, MS

To promote ethical and genuine patient engagement in PCTs, there are several key principles to consider:

Reciprocal Relationships

Genuine insight is captured when partners feel valued as equal and vital to the research process. A reciprocal relationship is a situation in which mutual efforts and benefits exist.

The principle is demonstrated when the roles and decision-making authority of all research partners, including the patient and other stakeholder partners, are defined collaboratively and clearly stated. (PCORI 2014)

Effective Communication

Clear, regular communication with patients promotes respect, trust, and relationship building. Using accessible language allows those who are not routinely engaged in the clinical research process to meaningfully participate and contribute to the research. Information on effectively disseminating PCT results to patients can be found in the "Dissemination to Patients" chapter. The NIH has also created a Checklist for Communicating Science and Health Research to the Public. Ways to communicate with patients include patient advocacy groups, government and study-specific websites, newsletters, emails, social media, news media, and other widely accessible platforms.

Co-Learning

A sense of openness and desire to educate and be educated by the patient partner should exist.

This principle is demonstrated when the goal is not to turn patients or other stakeholder partners into researchers, but to help them understand the research process; likewise the research team will learn about patient-centeredness and patient/other stakeholder engagement, and will incorporate patient and other stakeholder partners into the research process. (PCORI 2014).

Compensation

According to PCORI, when determining financial compensation for patient partners, consider the expertise, commitment, responsibility, type of work involved, and degree of participation. Fair compensation should encompass more than reimbursement for the expense or time that the patient partner incurs to participate in the patient engagement activity. While compensation will vary among research projects, the Table shows a model for how reasonable compensation can correspond to engagement activity levels (PCORI 2015).

Table. Sample Model for Fair Compensation of Patient Partners

Engagement Activity Level Description
Compensation is commensurate with the engagement activity level. For example, because of the time and effort required, a patient partner engaged in collaboration activities would be paid more than a patient partner who is informing the research team.
Inform Patient partner helps communicate research plans to the patient community
Consult Consulting the patient partner on research in which they offer opinions, advice, or feedback
Collaborate Patient partner makes decisions and acts alongside the researchers
Patient-directed Patient partner initiates and develops independent initiative

Adapted from PCORI (2015).

PCTs often engage patient partners across multiple health systems. Differences between health systems in their regulations and mechanisms for paying patient partners can cause delays and barriers. Research teams should understand payment options and processes before making promises to patient partners. Prioritizing fair and timely payment for patient partners is respectful and promotes trust with each patient partner and their community.

Cultural Humility

“Cultural humility is a process of self-reflection and discovery in order to build honest and trustworthy relationships” (Yeager et al 2019). Complete cultural competency is not possible for individuals who do not belong to the specific group or identity, so humility should be at the center of all patient interactions and communications. The research team should express this humble awareness from the beginning of engaging with patient partners, and carry the theme of cultural humility throughout the relationship. In addition, patient partners who communicate in a language other than the PCT’s primary language will provide valuable insight and experience.

Previous Section Next Section

SECTIONS

CHAPTER SECTIONS

sections

  1. Introduction
  2. Key Principles of Patient Engagement
  3. Patient Engagement Throughout a PCT
  4. Value of Patient Engagement to PCTs
  5. Ethical Considerations for Patient Engagement
  6. Potential Challenges
  7. Case Study: Patient Engagement in the OPTIMUM Trial
  8. Equity and Inclusion
  9. Additional Resources

Resources

PCORI Engagement Rubric

Provides information on the principles of partnership, such as transparency, honesty, trust, and effective communication

PCORI Financial Compensation of Engagement Research Partners

Provides information on ethical compensation of patient partners

REFERENCES

back to top

PCORI. 2014. PCORI Engagement Rubric. PCORI website. https://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf. Accessed January 21, 2024.

PCORI. 2015. Financial Compensation of Patients, Caregivers, and Patient/Caregiver Organizations Engaged in PCORI-Funded Research as Engaged Research Partners. PCORI website. https://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-Compensation-Framework-for-Engaged-Research-Partners.pdf. Accessed January 21, 2024.

Yeager KA, Bauer-Wu S. 2013. Cultural humility: essential foundation for clinical researchers. Appl Nurs Res. 26(4):251-256. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2013.06.008. PMID: 23938129.

back to top


Version History

Published February 12, 2024

current section :

Key Principles of Patient Engagement

  1. Introduction
  2. Key Principles of Patient Engagement
  3. Patient Engagement Throughout a PCT
  4. Value of Patient Engagement to PCTs
  5. Ethical Considerations for Patient Engagement
  6. Potential Challenges
  7. Case Study: Patient Engagement in the OPTIMUM Trial
  8. Equity and Inclusion
  9. Additional Resources

Citation:

George SZ. Patient Engagement: Key Principles of Patient Engagement. In: Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Bethesda, MD: NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Available at: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/chapters/design/patient-engagement/key-principles-of-patient-engagement/. Updated July 9, 2025. DOI: 10.28929/241.

Footer Menu

  • How to Use This Site
  • About NIH Collaboratory
  • Enrollment Reporting
  • Grand Rounds
  • Funding Statement
Link to Twitter Link to LinkedIn Link to Blue Sky Link to NIH Collaboratory email

Reference in this Web site to any specific commercial products, process, service, manufacturer, or company does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Government or National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH is not responsible for the contents of any “off-site” Web page referenced from this server.

Log in
Privacy Statement
WordPress is a content management system and should not be used to upload any PHI as it is not an environment for which we exercise oversight, meaning you the author are responsible for the content you post. Please use this system accordingly. Site Map