UH3 Project: Lumbar Imaging with Reporting of Epidemiology (LIRE)

UH3 Project: Lumbar Imaging with Reporting of Epidemiology (LIRE)

Principal Investigator:

Sponsoring Institution: University of Washington

Collaborators:

  • Kaiser Permanente, Northern California

  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute

  • Mayo Clinic Health System

  • Henry Ford Health System

  • Oregon Health and Science University

NIH Institutes Providing Oversight: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) and National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Program Official: Chuck Washabaugh, PhD (NIAMS)

Project Scientist: Robin Boineau, MD, MA (NCCIH)

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02015455

Study Locations: Clinics in California, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Washington

Trial Status: Completed

Study Snapshot

Trial Summary

Study question and significance: Spine imaging often has incidental findings that can lead to unnecessary tests and treatments. Prior observational research suggested that placing information about the prevalence of common findings in spine imaging reports may help reassure physicians and patients about such findings and reduce subsequent, unnecessary healthcare interventions. The objective of LIRE was to evaluate the impact of including benchmark prevalence data in routine spinal imaging reports on subsequent spine-related healthcare utilization and opioid prescriptions.

Design and setting: Stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial with 250,401 participants receiving care in 98 primary care clinics in 4 large healthcare systems between October 2013 and September 2016.

Intervention and methods: The control group had standard lumbar spine imaging reports, and the intervention group had reports with age-appropriate prevalence data for common imaging findings in individuals without back pain. The main outcome was healthcare utilization as measured in spine-related relative value units (RVUs) within 365 days of index imaging. A secondary outcome was the number of subsequent opioid prescriptions written by a primary care clinician. Prespecified subgroup analyses examined results by imaging modality.

Findings: The intervention did not reduce spine-related healthcare utilization. In prespecified secondary analyses, the intervention slightly reduced subsequent opioid prescriptions, and patients for whom computed tomography was the imaging modality had lower spine-related healthcare utilization.

Conclusions and relevance: Inserting benchmark prevalence information in lumbar spine imaging reports did not decrease subsequent spine-related RVUs but did reduce subsequent opioid prescriptions. The intervention text was simple, inexpensive, and easily implemented.

NIH Project Information

Data and Resource Sharing

VIEW ALL Resources

News and Interviews

Publications

Presentations

Back to top