Skip to content

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
  • Home
  • About
    • NIH Collaboratory
      • Coordinating Center
      • NIH Collaboratory Trials
      • Core Working Groups
      • Steering Committee
      • Distributed Research Network
      • Our Impact
    • Living Textbook
      • Table of Contents
      • How to Use This Site
  • Resources
    • Data and Resource Sharing
    • Training Resources
    • Tools for Researchers
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Repository
  • Webinar
  • Podcast
  • News
    • News Feed
    • Calendar
    • Subscribe
return to home
Subscribe to Newsletter go to twitter feed go to linkedin go to blue sky feed
Search
NIH Collaboratory
Living Textbook of
Pragmatic Clinical Trials

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
home button

Rethinking Clinical Trials

A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials

  • Design
    • What is a Pragmatic Clinical Trial?
    • Decentralized Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Developing a Compelling Grant Application
    • Experimental Designs and Randomization Schemes
    • Endpoints and Outcomes
    • Analysis Plan
    • Using Electronic Health Record Data
    • Building Partnerships and Teams to Ensure a Successful Trial
    • Intervention Delivery and Complexity
    • Patient Engagement
  • Data, Tools & Conduct
    • Assessing Feasibility
    • Acquiring Real-World Data
    • Assessing Fitness-for-Use of Real-World Data
    • Study Startup
    • Participant Recruitment
    • Monitoring Intervention Fidelity and Adaptations
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Mobile Health
    • Electronic Health Records–Based Phenotyping
    • Navigating the Unknown
  • Dissemination & Implementation
    • Data Sharing and Embedded Research
    • Dissemination Approaches for Different Audiences
    • Implementation
    • End-of-Trial Decision-Making
  • Ethics & Regulatory
    • Privacy Considerations
    • Identifying Those Engaged in Research
    • Collateral Findings
    • Consent, Disclosure, and Non-Disclosure
    • Data and Safety Monitoring
    • Ethical Considerations of Data Sharing in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Ethics for AI and ML
    • IRB Responsibilities and Procedures

Stepped Wedge Designs- ARCHIVED

CHAPTER SECTIONS

ARCHIVED PAGE

Archived on August 7, 2025. Go to the latest version.

Dissemination and Implementation


Section 7


Stepped Wedge Designs- ARCHIVED

Expand Contributors
Douglas Zatzick, MD

Leah Tuzzio, MPH

David Chambers, DPhil

Jerry Suls, PhD

Doyanne Darnell, PhD

Gloria Coronado, PhD

Lynn DeBar, PhD, MPH

 

Beverly Green, MD, MPH

Susan S. Huang, MD, MPH

Jeffrey G. Jarvik, MD, MPH

Edward Septimus, MD, FACP

Gregory Simon, MD, MPH

Miguel Vazquez, MD

Contributing Editor
Karen Staman, MS

Stepped wedge designs, on the surface, seem ideally suited to implementation because the intervention is eventually turned “on” at each of the sites. However, implementation is influenced by many internal and external factors, and is decidedly complex and timing of the decision to fully implement is an issue. We describe the utility of stepped wedge designs in the chapters Experimental Designs and Randomization Schemes and Designing With Implementation and Dissemination in Mind. Below, we describe the diffusion, dissemination, and implementation plan of the Lumbar Imaging with Reporting of Epidemiology (LIRE) trial, which uses a stepped wedge design, as well as a few of the unexpected complications that arose.

Case Example: Lumbar Imaging with Reporting of Epidemiology (LIRE)

The goal of LIRE: Determine if inserting epidemiological benchmarks (essentially representing the normal range) into lumbar spine imaging reports reduces subsequent tests and treatments.

The issues:

  • At one health system, despite buy-in from leadership, several individuals within certain clinics did not want the intervention. This had two effects. First, an individual radiologist could remove the intervention from a report during its creation. Since the dictation system defaulted to including the intervention information, and it required an extra step to delete the intervention text, this removal at the individual radiologist level happened relatively infrequently. Second, the leadership of a few clinics within the same health system wanted the text slightly modified and would not allow the intervention to be used until it was modified. Because this change required IRB approval, it took several months and resulted in a lack of adherence to random assignment during that time.
Strategy Details
Diffusion Any site with a radiology information system (RIS), radiology dictation system or EMR can automate the insertion of the prevalence information that constitutes our intervention. In fact, the text had already diffused to a limited extent at two health systems due to a publication in Radiology (McCullough et al. 2012). Investigators needed to ask these sites to stop using the intervention text prior to the start of the trial.
Dissemination Investigators worked closely with site PIs to individualize approaches as how to best introduce radiologists and primary care providers (PCPs) to the intervention. Since the intervention was “turned on” centrally, neither radiologists nor PCPs needed to alter their workflow. However, investigators needed to inform both groups prior to roll-out to garner their acceptance. They informed them through a variety of approaches including meetings with clinic leadership, staff meetings, and email notifications.
Implementation The stepped wedge design facilitates both implementation and sustainability because by the end of the study, the intervention is “on” at all sites.
Sustainability The decision whether to sustain the intervention varied by site. Two of the health systems do not have active plans to de-implement the intervention. Again, the stepped wedge design makes it easier for sites to sustain the intervention since this requires that they simply accept the status quo. One of the health systems is prudently waiting for the study results before deciding to keep the intervention. The final health system changed their EMR vendor following the study. After they switched systems, they decided not to re-implement the intervention but plan to re-visit this decision once study results are available If the evidence indicates that the intervention brings value, they will consider re-implementing the intervention.

Previous Section Next Section

SECTIONS

CHAPTER SECTIONS

sections

  1. Introduction – ARCHIVED
  2. Dissemination and Implementation Frameworks – ARCHIVED
  3. Let It, Help It, Make It Happen – ARCHIVED
  4. Changes to Policy and Guidelines – ARCHIVED
  5. Legislative Changes- ARCHIVED
  6. Creation of Targeted Tools- ARCHIVED
  7. Stepped Wedge Designs- ARCHIVED
  8. Intervention Staffing and Training Flexibility- ARCHIVED
  9. Pragmatic Implementation Process Assessments- ARCHIVED
  10. Partnering With Quality Improvement and Population Health Initiatives- ARCHIVED
  11. Implementation in the Trial Versus in the Real World- ARCHIVED
  12. Additional Resources- ARCHIVED
  13. FAQ- ARCHIVED

REFERENCES

back to top

McCullough BJ, Johnson GR, Martin BI, Jarvik JG. 2012. Lumbar MR imaging and reporting epidemiology: do epidemiologic data in reports affect clinical management? Radiology. 262:941–946. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110618. PMID:22357893.

back to top


Version History

December 5, 2018: Revised the LIRE sustainability information as part of the annual update (changes made by K. Staman).

Published August 25, 2017

current section :

Stepped Wedge Designs- ARCHIVED

  1. Introduction – ARCHIVED
  2. Dissemination and Implementation Frameworks – ARCHIVED
  3. Let It, Help It, Make It Happen – ARCHIVED
  4. Changes to Policy and Guidelines – ARCHIVED
  5. Legislative Changes- ARCHIVED
  6. Creation of Targeted Tools- ARCHIVED
  7. Stepped Wedge Designs- ARCHIVED
  8. Intervention Staffing and Training Flexibility- ARCHIVED
  9. Pragmatic Implementation Process Assessments- ARCHIVED
  10. Partnering With Quality Improvement and Population Health Initiatives- ARCHIVED
  11. Implementation in the Trial Versus in the Real World- ARCHIVED
  12. Additional Resources- ARCHIVED
  13. FAQ- ARCHIVED

Citation:

Zatzick D, Tuzzio L, Chambers D, et al. Dissemination and Implementation: Stepped Wedge Designs- ARCHIVED. In: Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Bethesda, MD: NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Available at: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/chapters/dissemination/dissemination-implementation-top/stepped-wedge-designs/. Updated December 3, 2025. DOI: 10.28929/078.

Footer Menu

  • How to Use This Site
  • About NIH Collaboratory
  • Enrollment Reporting
  • Grand Rounds
  • Funding Statement
Link to Twitter Link to LinkedIn Link to Blue Sky Link to NIH Collaboratory email

Reference in this Web site to any specific commercial products, process, service, manufacturer, or company does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Government or National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH is not responsible for the contents of any “off-site” Web page referenced from this server.

Log in
Privacy Statement
WordPress is a content management system and should not be used to upload any PHI as it is not an environment for which we exercise oversight, meaning you the author are responsible for the content you post. Please use this system accordingly. Site Map