Skip to content

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
  • Home
  • About
    • NIH Collaboratory
      • Coordinating Center
      • NIH Collaboratory Trials
      • Core Working Groups
      • Steering Committee
      • Distributed Research Network
      • Our Impact
    • Living Textbook
      • Table of Contents
      • How to Use This Site
  • Resources
    • Data and Resource Sharing
    • Training Resources
    • Tools for Researchers
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Repository
  • Webinar
  • Podcast
  • News
    • News Feed
    • Calendar
    • Subscribe
return to home
Subscribe to Newsletter go to twitter feed go to linkedin go to blue sky feed
Search
NIH Collaboratory
Living Textbook of
Pragmatic Clinical Trials

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
home button

Rethinking Clinical Trials

A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials

  • Design
    • What is a Pragmatic Clinical Trial?
    • Decentralized Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Developing a Compelling Grant Application
    • Experimental Designs and Randomization Schemes
    • Endpoints and Outcomes
    • Analysis Plan
    • Using Electronic Health Record Data
    • Building Partnerships and Teams to Ensure a Successful Trial
    • Intervention Delivery and Complexity
    • Patient Engagement
  • Data, Tools & Conduct
    • Assessing Feasibility
    • Acquiring Real-World Data
    • Assessing Fitness-for-Use of Real-World Data
    • Study Startup
    • Participant Recruitment
    • Monitoring Intervention Fidelity and Adaptations
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Mobile Health
    • Electronic Health Records–Based Phenotyping
    • Navigating the Unknown
  • Dissemination & Implementation
    • Data Sharing and Embedded Research
    • Dissemination Approaches for Different Audiences
    • Implementation
    • End-of-Trial Decision-Making
  • Ethics & Regulatory
    • Privacy Considerations
    • Identifying Those Engaged in Research
    • Collateral Findings
    • Consent, Disclosure, and Non-Disclosure
    • Data and Safety Monitoring
    • Ethical Considerations of Data Sharing in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Ethics for AI and ML
    • IRB Responsibilities and Procedures

Patient-Focused Drug Development

CHAPTER SECTIONS

Real-World Evidence: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs)


Section 9

Patient-Focused Drug Development

Expand Contributors

Kevin P. Weinfurt, PhD

Contributing Editor

Karen Staman, MS

The FDA is creating 4 methodological Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD) guidance documents to describe how to collect and submit patient experience data in clinical research. The guidance series is responsive to the mandates of the 21st Century Cures Act and other efforts to include patient experience data in support of regulatory decision-making and medical product development. Patient experience data include information about patients’ symptoms, the effects the disease has on patients over time, and patients’ experience with and views about treatments. It also includes information about patients’ views about the disease, treatment, and outcomes, and the relationship amongst those things. It includes information about the impact of the disease and treatment on the patient, patients’ thoughts about potential and current treatments, and the patients’ enhanced understanding of the progression, severity, and chronicity of the disease.

The guidance series consists of 4 documents:

Guidance 1: Collecting Comprehensive and Representative Input

Guidance 1 was released in June 2020 and is designed for those planning a study and deciding on sampling methods for the collection of patient input. Approaches for patient selection and input collection depend on the research question, and FDA recommends examining previous studies and relevant literature and consulting subject matter experts regarding decisions on methodology and study materials.

Guidance 1 describes the steps in the process of collecting input, which include defining a research question, describing the target population and who will be providing the data (patients, caregivers, or clinicians), choosing a data collection methodology, and collecting, storing and managing the data. Of note, when choosing data collection methodology and setting, ensure the data collected are representative of the population and consider the inclusion of diverse sites to better enable a representative sample.

Read the full guidance.

 

Guidance 2: Methods to Identify What Is Important to Patients

This draft guidance describes what to ask patients and why. It describes qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches and provides best practices for eliciting information that is important to patients, including special populations (children, the cognitively impaired, and those with rare diseases) and diverse populations.

Read the draft guidance.

 

Guidance 3: Selecting, Developing, or Modifying Fit-for-Purpose Clinical Outcomes

This guidance is intended to help investigators decide what to measure and how to select or develop clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that are fit for the purpose of assessing outcomes that are important to patients. It “describes how stakeholders (patients, caregivers, researchers, medical product developers, and others) can collect and submit patient experience data and other relevant information from patients and caregivers to be used for medical product development and regulatory decision-making.”

Read the draft guidance.

 

Guidance 4: Incorporating Clinical Outcome Assessments Into Endpoints for Regulatory Decision-Making

This guidance is forthcoming and will describe how to incorporate a given clinical outcome assessment tool or a set of measures into a clinical research study. The guidance will include information about defining meaningful change, and the collection, analysis, interpretation, and submission of data.

Previous Section Next Section

SECTIONS

CHAPTER SECTIONS

sections

  1. Introduction
  2. How Are PRO Measures Used?
  3. Best Practices for Collecting PRO Measures in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
  4. NIH HEAL, FDA, and Other Core Outcome Sets
  5. Choosing PRO Measures
  6. Cultural Adaptation and Linguistic Translation
  7. Case Study From Guiding Good Choices for Health
  8. Incorporating PRO Data Into the EHR
  9. Patient-Focused Drug Development
  10. Additional Resources


Version History

September 14, 2022: Updated as part of annual review (changes made by K. Staman).

Published February 7, 2022

current section :

Patient-Focused Drug Development

  1. Introduction
  2. How Are PRO Measures Used?
  3. Best Practices for Collecting PRO Measures in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
  4. NIH HEAL, FDA, and Other Core Outcome Sets
  5. Choosing PRO Measures
  6. Cultural Adaptation and Linguistic Translation
  7. Case Study From Guiding Good Choices for Health
  8. Incorporating PRO Data Into the EHR
  9. Patient-Focused Drug Development
  10. Additional Resources

Citation:

Weinfurt, K. Real-World Evidence: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs): Patient-Focused Drug Development. In: Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Bethesda, MD: NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Available at: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/chapters/conduct/real-world-evidence-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/patient-focused-drug-development/. Updated December 2, 2022. DOI: 10.28929/197.

Footer Menu

  • How to Use This Site
  • About NIH Collaboratory
  • Enrollment Reporting
  • Grand Rounds
  • Funding Statement
Link to Twitter Link to LinkedIn Link to Blue Sky Link to NIH Collaboratory email

Reference in this Web site to any specific commercial products, process, service, manufacturer, or company does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Government or National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH is not responsible for the contents of any “off-site” Web page referenced from this server.

Log in
Privacy Statement
WordPress is a content management system and should not be used to upload any PHI as it is not an environment for which we exercise oversight, meaning you the author are responsible for the content you post. Please use this system accordingly. Site Map