Skip to content

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
  • Home
  • About
    • NIH Collaboratory
      • Coordinating Center
      • NIH Collaboratory Trials
      • Core Working Groups
      • Steering Committee
      • Distributed Research Network
      • Our Impact
    • Living Textbook
      • Table of Contents
      • How to Use This Site
  • Resources
    • Data and Resource Sharing
    • Training Resources
    • Tools for Researchers
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Repository
  • Webinar
  • Podcast
  • News
    • News Feed
    • Calendar
    • Subscribe
return to home
Subscribe to Newsletter go to twitter feed go to linkedin go to blue sky feed
Search
NIH Collaboratory
Living Textbook of
Pragmatic Clinical Trials

COVID-19 Resources

Access the latest information on COVID-19 for clinical researchers
home button

Rethinking Clinical Trials

A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials

  • Design
    • What is a Pragmatic Clinical Trial?
    • Decentralized Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Developing a Compelling Grant Application
    • Experimental Designs and Randomization Schemes
    • Endpoints and Outcomes
    • Analysis Plan
    • Using Electronic Health Record Data
    • Building Partnerships and Teams to Ensure a Successful Trial
    • Intervention Delivery and Complexity
    • Patient Engagement
  • Data, Tools & Conduct
    • Assessing Feasibility
    • Acquiring Real-World Data
    • Assessing Fitness-for-Use of Real-World Data
    • Study Startup
    • Participant Recruitment
    • Monitoring Intervention Fidelity and Adaptations
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Electronic Health Records–Based Phenotyping
    • Navigating the Unknown
  • Interpretation, Dissemination & Implementation
    • Data Sharing and Embedded Research
    • Collaborating With Health System Partners to Review and Understand Trial Results
    • Dissemination Approaches for Different Audiences
    • Implementation
    • End-of-Trial Decision-Making
  • Ethics & Regulatory
    • Privacy Considerations
    • Identifying Those Engaged in Research
    • Collateral Findings
    • Consent, Disclosure, and Non-Disclosure
    • Data and Safety Monitoring
    • Ethical Considerations of Data Sharing in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    • Ethics for AI and ML
    • IRB Responsibilities and Procedures

Case Studies From PRISM NIH Collaboratory Trials

CHAPTER SECTIONS

Identifying Those Engaged in Research


Section 5

Case Studies From PRISM NIH Collaboratory Trials

ExpandContributors

Pearl O’Rourke, MD
Benjamin S. Wilfond, MD

Contributing Editors

Karen Staman, MS
Damon M. Seils, MA

In this section, we describe 4 of the NIH Collaboratory Trials supported through the NIH HEAL Initiative’s Pragmatic and Implementation Studies for the Management of Pain to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (PRISM) program as examples to explore how to identify the individuals or groups who should be considered as subjects, study team members,  or others involved in research in order to determine the appropriate mechanism for oversight. The goal of accurately identifying the research participant is to apply the appropriate methods for respecting their autonomy and protecting their rights and welfare.

Table. NIH Collaboratory Trials: Identifying the Research Participants, Study Team, and Service Providers

Study Intervention Research Participants Study Team Non–Study Team Service Provider
FM-TIPS

 

 

Addition of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to routine physical therapy Patients with fibromyalgia Researchers at a health center who designed and oversee the research Physical therapists
GRACE Guided relaxation and acupuncture Patients with sickle cell disease Researchers at 3 health centers who designed and oversee the research

 

Acupuncturists

 

 

NOHARM EHR-embedded patient- and clinician-facing decision support Patients undergoing surgery Researchers at a health center who developed the clinical decision support tool and training in pain management Inpatient nurses, physical or occupational therapists, post-anesthesia care unit or postoperative nurses
OPTIMUM (Greco et al 2021) Group-based mindfulness-based stress reduction Patients with chronic low back pain Researchers at 3 health centers who designed and oversee the research Mindfulness instructors who conduct the training sessions in partnership with primary care physicians at the health centers

 

Abbreviations: EHR, electronic health record; PRISM, Pragmatic and Implementation Studies for the Management of Pain to Reduce Opioid Prescribing.

Conclusions

Clinical research involves several people in different roles: researchers and the study team, research subjects, and service providers and others who may be affected by the research. Oversight and application of federal regulations differ for each of these roles. While the US federal regulations for the protection of research subjects apply only to human subjects, there may be institutional policies that apply more broadly. Members of the study team must adhere to regulatory requirements of mandated training and have an institutional FWA for federally funded research. In contrast, service providers are not subject to these requirements.

Identifying each of these roles can be challenging, especially in pragmatic trials that are embedded in routine clinical care. Identifying the research subject and those engaged in research is a critical, early step in the design of pragmatic clinical trial.

Previous Section

SECTIONS

CHAPTER SECTIONS

sections

  1. Introduction
  2. Human Subjects/Research Participants and Others Affected by the Research
  3. Identifying Those Involved in the Process of the Research
  4. Clinicians’ Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Research
  5. Case Studies From PRISM NIH Collaboratory Trials


Version History

November 3, 2026: Made nonsubstantive edits for style and clarity as part of the biennial review (changes made by D. Seils).

March 1, 2023: Made nonsubstantive formatting updates (changes made by D. Seils).

Published September 21, 2022

current section :

Case Studies From PRISM NIH Collaboratory Trials

  1. Introduction
  2. Human Subjects/Research Participants and Others Affected by the Research
  3. Identifying Those Involved in the Process of the Research
  4. Clinicians’ Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Research
  5. Case Studies From PRISM NIH Collaboratory Trials

Citation:

O’Rourke P, Wilfond BS. Identifying Those Engaged in Research: Case Studies From PRISM NIH Collaboratory Trials. In: Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Bethesda, MD: NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Available at: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/chapters/ethics-and-regulatory/identifying-those-engaged-in-research/case-studies-from-prism-projects/. Updated November 3, 2026. DOI: 10.28929/169.

Footer Menu

  • How to Use This Site
  • About NIH Collaboratory
  • Enrollment Reporting
  • Grand Rounds
  • Funding Statement
Link to Twitter Link to LinkedIn Link to Blue Sky Link to NIH Collaboratory email

Reference in this Web site to any specific commercial products, process, service, manufacturer, or company does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Government or National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH is not responsible for the contents of any “off-site” Web page referenced from this server.

Log in
Privacy Statement
WordPress is a content management system and should not be used to upload any PHI as it is not an environment for which we exercise oversight, meaning you the author are responsible for the content you post. Please use this system accordingly. Site Map