October 11, 2022: AHRQ Announces Healthcare Systems Data Challenge

AHRQ logoThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) announced a new competition to explore the feasibility, resources, and infrastructure needed to integrate real-world healthcare system data into the agency’s systematic review findings to improve healthcare practice. The top award winner could earn up to $200,000.

Learn more about AHRQ’s Challenge on Integrating Healthcare System Data With Systematic Review Findings.

The two-phase challenge aims to incorporate unpublished healthcare system data into AHRQ’s systematic review findings to inform local healthcare decisions better. This additional information may be particularly valuable when results from systematic reviews are limited by the number of research studies or only include studies with narrow patient populations.

For details about AHRQ’s challenge, view the Federal Register Notice.

March 22, 2022: AHRQ Publishes Hospital Infection Prevention Toolkit Based on ABATE Infection Trial

ABATE Infection logoThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) published a new Toolkit for Decolonization of Non-ICU Patients With Devices to help clinical teams implement a protocol to reduce bloodstream infections by approximately 30% in patients with specific medical devices.

The new toolkit is based on intervention materials successfully used in the ABATE Infection trial, one of the first NIH Collaboratory Trials of the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. ABATE Infection was a large-scale pragmatic trial involving approximately 189,000 patients in the baseline period and 340,000 patients in the intervention period across 194 non–critical care units in 53 hospitals.

From the AHRQ announcement:

The free, customizable toolkit includes step-by-step instructions, handouts, and educational videos to show frontline teams how to apply a decolonization protocol for non-ICU patients who may be at greater risk of bloodstream infections because they have certain devices, such as central venous catheters. The decolonization protocol includes instructions on helping patients bathe with an antiseptic soap and applying a nasal antibiotic ointment to carriers of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

ABATE Infection was supported within the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory by a cooperative agreement from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and by the NIH Common Fund through a cooperative agreement from the Office of Strategic Coordination within the Office of the NIH Director. Learn more about ABATE Infection.

March 14, 2018: Public Input on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Due April 1

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is requesting information to help inform a competition in the fall to develop and implement user-friendly technical tools for the collection of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. The AHRQ is interested in learning about experiences with physical function PRO measures that are currently in use in ambulatory care settings, including primary and secondary care, as well as the methods used to collect these data. The information will be used to select physical function measures for the competition, which aims to bolster collection and integration of PRO data in the electronic health record by developing and piloting new, user-friendly tools. Responses can be emailed to Janey.hsiao@ahrq.hhs.gov and are due April 1, 2018.

Study Examines Public Attitudes Toward Data-Sharing Networks


A new study examining public attitudes about the sharing of personal medical data through health information exchanges and distributed research networks finds a mixture of receptiveness and concerns about privacy and security. The study, conducted by researchers from the University of California, Davis and University of California, San Diego and published online in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), reports results from a telephone survey of 800 California residents. Participants were asked for their opinions about the importance of sharing personal health data for research purposes and their feelings about related issues of security and privacy, as well as the importance of notification and permission for such sharing.

The authors found that a majority of respondents felt that sharing health data would “greatly improve” the quality of medical care and research. Further, many either somewhat or strongly agreed that the potential benefits of sharing data for research and care improvement outweighed privacy considerations (50.8%) or the right to control the use of their personal information (69.8%), although study participants also indicated that transparency regarding the purpose of any data sharing and controlling access to data remained important considerations.

However, the study’s investigators also found evidence of widespread concern over privacy and security issues, with substantial proportions of respondents reporting a belief that data sharing would have negative effects on the security (42.5%) and privacy (40.3%) of their health data. The study also explored attitudes about the need to obtain permission for sharing health data, as well as whether attitudes toward sharing data differed according to the purpose (e.g., for research vs. care) and the groups or individuals among which the data were being shared.

The authors note that while data-sharing networks are increasingly viewed as a crucial tool for enabling research and improving care on a national scale, they ultimately rely upon trust and acceptance from patients. As such, the long-term success of efforts aimed at building effective data-sharing networks may depend on accurately understanding the views of patients and accommodating their concerns.


Read the full article here: 

Kim KK, Joseph JG, Ohno-Machado L. Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar 30. pii: ocv014. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014. [Epub ahead of print]